|
Post by ocarina on Jan 11, 2019 21:34:18 GMT
Intermittent reinforcement is really pervasive in these relationships and if a primary caregiver in childhood was intermittently available/ unavailable the neurological pathways are already in place which makes you more vulnerable to falling for the dynamic and behaving in a way that sustains the dance:
www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/life-after-50/201701/love-me-love-me-not
This Aeon article whilst not directly related to attachment describes the mechanisms very elegantly - so often we get caught in self blame around these relationships but in reality this response to intermittent reinforcement is hardwired in all of us - and it takes real self awareness and security to not become reactive in these situations. Those lucky enough to have had nurturing early lives who are less likely to really crave love and connection as a way of completing themselves are still vulnerable - but less likely to give up on themselves in favour of an unhealthy pairing.
aeon.co/essays/if-the-internet-is-addictive-why-don-t-we-regulate-it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 22:12:12 GMT
Not derailing at all!! From my reading of Attached, the idea is that if you are AP, being in a relationship with an avoidant can be triggering, sending your body and mind into anxious overdrive when we feel them as pulling away. We can misinterpret our strong sensations as passion or love for the person when in fact it is just our attachment system flaring up. Our systems only calm down when we feel our connection has been restored again. Repeat many times. Connection with a secure person doesn't cause all these highs and lows so we might not think we are feeling strongly or passionately about them, says the book. In my case, DA/FA was inconsistent in texting and planning which made me anxious--so when I did get a text or we had a great hangout, I would feel briefly awash with happy relief. Yet I remember an evening when we were sitting in my kitchen and he was getting ready to leave. I was tired so happy enough to see him go and I thought, "THIS guy is what all my fuss was about?" It is like my sensations had taken on a life of their own and he was just the occasion or spark for them. The signifier had become unloosed from the signified as we used to say in college. The self discovery I've done in this place is almost unparalleled. It makes so much sense now. The way it goes for me, I'd get triggered a bit avoidant (relieved that he disappears), THEN I'd get triggered anxious as I realized he's gone and avoiding me -cue sadness and abandonment fears- and mistake that trigger for me caring "sooo much" about him ( this is what you're talking about), THEN I get over the anxious trigger and see the situation for what it is, so that by the time he is back, I'm neither happy nor relieved. But by then I've made myself believe that, seeing his terrible patterns, I "don't like him" after all, which isn't quite true (?!), and am back to square 1. Randomly then, I'd feel my feelings come back for him, either not triggered by anything he did, or because he'd open up more. Does this mean my feelings were fake? This is messed up to say the least. But I'm so happy that it doesn't look like a typical AP/DA thingie like it used to in the past and that I've individuated from it. !!!!!!!!!! Thank you guys.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jan 11, 2019 22:36:08 GMT
@blacksnow, I don't think your feelings are fake, persay. But because of the attachment style stuff, there's a disconnect. Emotions in general are supposed to be guides and indicators but not necessarily truth. When you've got an insecure style and some internal disconnection or blockers, then you may feel feelings and emotions you do have but misattribute them.
So for example, you're triggered AP because you perceive a partner left. Maybe it feels like omg it must be love! But it's really an overactive nervous system responding to a fear of abandonment, searching for a way to reconnect so you can survive and won't die. Because this made sense as a response when you were a little kid, and maybe it was life and death. But though it isn't now, old conditioning is still in there. And it hardly seems intuitive to feel that passion and need for someone and attribute it to a scary environment when you were a child, right???
After all the experiences I've had, both assessing myself and observing my insecurely attached exes, I believe you can't know how you actually feel about someone if you're triggered. It is the space between triggers that can let you see both what your feelings are and attribute them correctly. However, an issue for unaware FA, and for unaware AP as well, is that space can seem boring compared to being anxiously triggered. I've come to really dislike being AP triggered at this point, and found a lot more preferable comfort, stability, and actual love with my ex FA when I was working toward secure and we were trying to reconcile. However, he wasn't moving towards secure so ended up finding the diminished sexual sparks (ie I wasn't triggering him anxious) boring so he left. Sometimes I'd wonder if I should try to instigate anxious triggering but I ultimately decided that was totally unhealthy because I don't want a relationship that relies on triggering. That, to me, is fake and creates distance instead of real connection and intimacy (versus a fantasy bond and being stuck in a pattern instead of growth), which is ultimately what I want.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 23:31:40 GMT
This is amazing. So basically, the lesson that I'm learning here is that I need to be more careful with my feelings, like don't read too much into them. I think you're right. So I have two questions alexandra . 1. Do you think the fact that he left because he found it boring "evidence" that, on his side, the feelings weren't actually real? Or is it that they might've been, but he just couldn't tell? 2. As an extension of the first question, do you think the only thing that holds insecurely attached people together is mostly their style? Could it ever be only their style?
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Jan 11, 2019 23:49:10 GMT
Not derailing at all!! From my reading of Attached, the idea is that if you are AP, being in a relationship with an avoidant can be triggering, sending your body and mind into anxious overdrive when we feel them as pulling away. We can misinterpret our strong sensations as passion or love for the person when in fact it is just our attachment system flaring up. Our systems only calm down when we feel our connection has been restored again. Repeat many times. Connection with a secure person doesn't cause all these highs and lows so we might not think we are feeling strongly or passionately about them, says the book. In my case, DA/FA was inconsistent in texting and planning which made me anxious--so when I did get a text or we had a great hangout, I would feel briefly awash with happy relief. Yet I remember an evening when we were sitting in my kitchen and he was getting ready to leave. I was tired so happy enough to see him go and I thought, "THIS guy is what all my fuss was about?" It is like my sensations had taken on a life of their own and he was just the occasion or spark for them. The signifier had become unloosed from the signified as we used to say in college. The self discovery I've done in this place is almost unparalleled. It makes so much sense now. The way it goes for me, I'd get triggered a bit avoidant (relieved that he disappears), THEN I'd get triggered anxious as I realized he's gone and avoiding me -cue sadness and abandonment fears- and mistake that trigger for me caring "sooo much" about him ( this is what you're talking about), THEN I get over the anxious trigger and see the situation for what it is, so that by the time he is back, I'm neither happy nor relieved. But by then I've made myself believe that, seeing his terrible patterns, I "don't like him" after all, which isn't quite true (?!), and am back to square 1. Randomly then, I'd feel my feelings come back for him, either not triggered by anything he did, or because he'd open up more. Does this mean my feelings were fake? This is messed up to say the least. But I'm so happy that it doesn't look like a typical AP/DA thingie like it used to in the past and that I've individuated from it. !!!!!!!!!! Thank you guys. The cycle in a nutshell. A secure will walk away from such crazy making.
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Jan 12, 2019 0:16:55 GMT
@blacksnow, I don't think your feelings are fake, persay. But because of the attachment style stuff, there's a disconnect. Emotions in general are supposed to be guides and indicators but not necessarily truth. When you've got an insecure style and some internal disconnection or blockers, then you may feel feelings and emotions you do have but misattribute them. So for example, you're triggered AP because you perceive a partner left. Maybe it feels like omg it must be love! But it's really an overactive nervous system responding to a fear of abandonment, searching for a way to reconnect so you can survive and won't die. Because this made sense as a response when you were a little kid, and maybe it was life and death. But though it isn't now, old conditioning is still in there. And it hardly seems intuitive to feel that passion and need for someone and attribute it to a scary environment when you were a child, right??? After all the experiences I've had, both assessing myself and observing my insecurely attached exes, I believe you can't know how you actually feel about someone if you're triggered. It is the space between triggers that can let you see both what your feelings are and attribute them correctly. However, an issue for unaware FA, and for unaware AP as well, is that space can seem boring compared to being anxiously triggered. I've come to really dislike being AP triggered at this point, and found a lot more preferable comfort, stability, and actual love with my ex FA when I was working toward secure and we were trying to reconcile. However, he wasn't moving towards secure so ended up finding the diminished sexual sparks (ie I wasn't triggering him anxious) boring so he left. Sometimes I'd wonder if I should try to instigate anxious triggering but I ultimately decided that was totally unhealthy because I don't want a relationship that relies on triggering. That, to me, is fake and creates distance instead of real connection and intimacy (versus a fantasy bond and being stuck in a pattern instead of growth), which is ultimately what I want. Interesting points, Alexandra...I’ve thought about this whole love thing, too and how it relates to being actively triggered. When my ex left, I felt this desperate need to be with him and was so obviously triggered by his abandonment that I felt like I couldn’t go on without him. Looking back, I don’t ever want to be that co-dependent and vulnerable again. I wanted to die. I never questioned my love for him when together and not immediately after the break, but now over a year later I’ve reflected on that part. I’ve had time to heal and I’ve ask myself those questions- do I want him? Need him? Why? Do I love him? If so, what is love anyway? A feeling, a choice? I don’t feel the desperate need anymore, but in my calm state, I still feel desire for him and still have this open space in my heart. I’ve still made the choice to be here for him. I believe I do love him, but I’ve pushed it aside in case we never reconcile. His biggest hurdle is learning to trust again. If he can trust, I believe we can work through this. Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Jan 12, 2019 0:27:34 GMT
I've never read the book but I still can't really tell if this is what happened to me. I don't want to derail your thread... but since you mention it, I wonder if it's the same: I feel anxiety (really, just uncomfort and like I don't know how to act) after I'd get closer to DA guy, and he'd disappear right around that time almost like he knew it was a bad time, I'd be relieved I didn't have to see him. Is this different? Trying to figure out if that's me being "triggered AP" though it seems like it's not. AP is when you DO want to see them, right guys? Can you describe how you mistook it for strong feelings for him? I feel like a science experiment gone bad. Not derailing at all!! From my reading of Attached, the idea is that if you are AP, being in a relationship with an avoidant can be triggering, sending your body and mind into anxious overdrive when we feel them as pulling away. We can misinterpret our strong sensations as passion or love for the person when in fact it is just our attachment system flaring up. Our systems only calm down when we feel our connection has been restored again. Repeat many times. Connection with a secure person doesn't cause all these highs and lows so we might not think we are feeling strongly or passionately about them, says the book. In my case, DA/FA was inconsistent in texting and planning which made me anxious--so when I did get a text or we had a great hangout, I would feel briefly awash with happy relief. Yet I remember an evening when we were sitting in my kitchen and he was getting ready to leave. I was tired so happy enough to see him go and I thought, "THIS guy is what all my fuss was about?" It is like my sensations had taken on a life of their own and he was just the occasion or spark for them. The signifier had become unloosed from the signified as we used to say in college. I don’t get that connection with my AP bc when I fell for this guy it’s when we were close and he was attentive, supportive, wonderful. I had a few unreasonable AP moments due to my own issues but when I fell for him there was no pulling away- only intimacy.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Jan 12, 2019 3:39:14 GMT
@blacksnow, I don't think your feelings are fake, persay. But because of the attachment style stuff, there's a disconnect. Emotions in general are supposed to be guides and indicators but not necessarily truth. When you've got an insecure style and some internal disconnection or blockers, then you may feel feelings and emotions you do have but misattribute them. So for example, you're triggered AP because you perceive a partner left. Maybe it feels like omg it must be love! But it's really an overactive nervous system responding to a fear of abandonment, searching for a way to reconnect so you can survive and won't die. Because this made sense as a response when you were a little kid, and maybe it was life and death. But though it isn't now, old conditioning is still in there. And it hardly seems intuitive to feel that passion and need for someone and attribute it to a scary environment when you were a child, right??? After all the experiences I've had, both assessing myself and observing my insecurely attached exes, I believe you can't know how you actually feel about someone if you're triggered. It is the space between triggers that can let you see both what your feelings are and attribute them correctly. However, an issue for unaware FA, and for unaware AP as well, is that space can seem boring compared to being anxiously triggered. I've come to really dislike being AP triggered at this point, and found a lot more preferable comfort, stability, and actual love with my ex FA when I was working toward secure and we were trying to reconcile. However, he wasn't moving towards secure so ended up finding the diminished sexual sparks (ie I wasn't triggering him anxious) boring so he left. Sometimes I'd wonder if I should try to instigate anxious triggering but I ultimately decided that was totally unhealthy because I don't want a relationship that relies on triggering. That, to me, is fake and creates distance instead of real connection and intimacy (versus a fantasy bond and being stuck in a pattern instead of growth), which is ultimately what I want. Alexandra, so how do you think sexuality is different in a secure relationship or as a person (you?) become more secure? If it isn't about sparks, passion, desire, chasing attraction, etc., what is the motivator? This is something I have a hard time fully understanding as someone who has had a very fiery fantasy life that doesn't reconcile with reality. In the AP mindset it's so easy to feel unfulfilled, but that may he unrealistic expectations or a sense that sex should be a particular thing. What's the secure mindset about sexuality, particularly in long term relationships where there isn't a honeymoon phase going on?
|
|
|
Post by stayhappy on Jan 12, 2019 6:56:13 GMT
Alexandra, so how do you think sexuality is different in a secure relationship or as a person (you?) become more secure? If it isn't about sparks, passion, desire, chasing attraction, etc., what is the motivator? This is something I have a hard time fully understanding as someone who has had a very fiery fantasy life that doesn't reconcile with reality. In the AP mindset it's so easy to feel unfulfilled, but that may he unrealistic expectations or a sense that sex should be a particular thing. What's the secure mindset about sexuality, particularly in long term relationships where there isn't a honeymoon phase going on? [/quote]
That’s interesting! In secure relationships there is passion, attracation and great sex. But sex is also an way to stay connected and show love. I like crazy nice sex but I don’t really like a nice, crazy, up and down relationship. Sex don’t get boring, my attractions don’t get less when someone give consistency in the day-day life.
|
|
|
Post by sissyk on Jan 12, 2019 13:50:37 GMT
As I lamented at the top of this thread, my DA/FA didn't want to have sex as it would mean we were in a real relationship. But frankly that was likely part of his appeal for me. As Madonna said, rejection is the greatest aphrodisiac.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jan 12, 2019 22:11:00 GMT
So I have two questions alexandra . 1. Do you think the fact that he left because he found it boring "evidence" that, on his side, the feelings weren't actually real? Or is it that they might've been, but he just couldn't tell? 2. As an extension of the first question, do you think the only thing that holds insecurely attached people together is mostly their style? Could it ever be only their style? Well... yes and no. He and I have talked about that directly, and, in true FA reactionary fashion, it depends on the day. (In fact, typing you an answer to this of reasonable length was hard, because it's so convoluted and full of his contradictions, and getting into too much detail on a public board, so I may try to send you a more detailed answer separately). But, there's a couple main problems. First, he knows he cares enormously about me. He's always owned up to how strongly he feels our emotional connection. He actually knows something is wrong on his end and it's not me (we had zero issues physically for several months, and magically the attraction returns if he's triggered anxious), but he doesn't understand his problems to the point that he's decided they are "inactionable." However, I know the truth is he's too scared of what he's going to find to do the work. So, that is on him, and it is his choice not to want to become aware and face it. It's easier for him in the short-term to sink back into the idea of, if he is attracted to what sounds like every woman in the entire world EXCEPT me, then I am the problem. So he knows I'm not the problem when he's not triggered (though he still doesn't have the capacity to deal with it at those times and gets depressed about it), and it's easier for him to deflect blame when he is. Which is a lot of negativity to hold in a relationship, so I understand why he took the easy way out. And I've had to walk away too, because after going through two full relationship cycles and finally understanding it, there's zero I can do if I put my work in on to fix my own issues but he's still unwilling to do the same, and I deserve a lot more than a guy who just wants to run away. The other problem is, because he can't make sense of his feelings, he uses sexual attraction as his only "reliable" gauge. Because how do you argue with attraction? And over-prioritizes that type of connection. Then he double misattributes because in addition to that... he had an epiphany one day that he's AP, due to his awareness of his anxious triggers with all his avoidant exes. That's most of his dating history, and what he's comparing me to. He has zero awareness that he also deactivates. I told him once I started noticing, because this isn't something he only does with me, but he just defensively rejects the entire concept and doesn't want to hear it. Which.......... case in point, right? It's going to be really difficult to confront your insecure attachment if you have it pegged incorrectly, because they all evolve for slightly different reasons and result in different behaviors and require different work to overcome. I think the answer to your style question depends on the source of the connection. If it's mostly sex holding together the relationship, or something more like trauma bonding, then yes, I do believe it's basically their insecure attachment styles and the holes they're trying to fill through that holding things together. It's more about the sparks, intermittent reinforcement, and addictive qualities. If the emotional connection and friendship and actual affection and caring foundation is truly there, then the attachment style is doing the opposite and getting in the way of holding things together. It's getting in the way of true connection, intimacy, vulnerability, and choosing to do what's best for both you and your partner, because insecure attachment is going to result in an imbalance (you're either going to go too far to one side and lose yourself or too far to the other and protect yourself).
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Jan 13, 2019 1:17:07 GMT
As I lamented at the top of this thread, my DA/FA didn't want to have sex as it would mean we were in a real relationship. But frankly that was likely part of his appeal for me. As Madonna said, rejection is the greatest aphrodisiac. He’s likely afraid of strings and expectations. You also may grow resentful- good chance that you’ll expect more and grow anxious. My ex DA/FA will still let me in that way. I feel the sex and massage- any touch is trust building. The fact he “allows” it is probably a big deal for an avoidant.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jan 13, 2019 3:16:08 GMT
Alexandra, so how do you think sexuality is different in a secure relationship or as a person (you?) become more secure? If it isn't about sparks, passion, desire, chasing attraction, etc., what is the motivator? This is something I have a hard time fully understanding as someone who has had a very fiery fantasy life that doesn't reconcile with reality. In the AP mindset it's so easy to feel unfulfilled, but that may he unrealistic expectations or a sense that sex should be a particular thing. What's the secure mindset about sexuality, particularly in long term relationships where there isn't a honeymoon phase going on? That’s interesting! In secure relationships there is passion, attracation and great sex. But sex is also an way to stay connected and show love. I like crazy nice sex but I don’t really like a nice, crazy, up and down relationship. Sex don’t get boring, my attractions don’t get less when someone give consistency in the day-day life. leavethelighton, I agree with stayhappy and was going to say something similar. There's still passion but it's not overwhelming emotional hunger or need. I found it to be far more about expressing and sharing connection, sharing comfort and experience, feeling appreciative and just liking the other person without push/pull. The passion I then really started to feel came from starting to feel safe enough to really want to explore some stuff I hadn't before. Unfortunately, we didn't get far into that because of the subsequent deactivating. I can't speak to feeling that way in very long-term partnerships of years upon decades because I haven't gotten there yet. My best guess would be, if the most excitement I was feeling was coming from exploration possibilities, that's why you'd have to do some creativity work to keep things as fresh later on, when less has been left unexplored. Or, creating some physical space (not emotional space, maybe like affectionate touch but no release) to more appreciate coming back together. My AP mindset was all about sparks and chasing attraction, and while coupling with DAs was always the most physically, uh, rewarding in regards to intensity, I was never satisfied or fulfilled and my anxiety would kick back in after the afterglow... because when there wasn't enough stability, which there wasn't because of the insecure foundations that were mostly based on intense triggering, it seemed it could end at any moment. I was with one person between relationships with my ex. The sexual chemistry was nuts... but unfortunately, so was he. He got flat out mean and gaslighted me after just a few weeks, and I ran away because it was hardly worth it. And, I was still AP but had gone through several months of work at that point, so more secure than in previous romantic situations. Sorry we're tangenting so much sissyk!
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jan 13, 2019 3:24:39 GMT
Oh, and also, I don't think you should pressure yourself about what sex "should" feel like, what one particular thing especially. That seems limiting, and people are complicated and can express themselves quite differently. It's not going to be the same every time with one partner anyway (or it would almost certainly get boring!).
|
|
|
Post by sissyk on Jan 13, 2019 14:24:04 GMT
Interupting sex ed for an update So my DA/FA and I went out for a catch up dinner and had a lovely comfortable time. He was proactive in the planning. We yapped away for several hours, he brought me a gift for my horse in Christmas paper. It was not weird as I feared. At the end I said I am glad I didn't scare you off for good! and he said Oh you didn't! We had a little laugh. We talked about getting together again in a few weeks. Have my feelings for him been completely dry cleaned away? No. They are bundled in there with my respect and enthusiasm for him. I'm back on the dating site, a bit sadder and wiser. I am feeling some hope this might work as as friends. The risk seems worth it right now but I know to watch for "the dance" beginning.
|
|