|
Post by alexandra on Dec 9, 2019 5:41:44 GMT
@janedoe, sadly I was probably able to do that because I have so much experience with softbois. A couple years ago, a close FA girlfriend sent me a message to a similar article saying, look! Softboi! All your exes finally have an official name! 🤣
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 10, 2019 6:45:26 GMT
Thanks @janedoe, happy to be helpful!
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Dec 10, 2019 7:35:57 GMT
My ex best mate was like this. Silver tongue, could sell ice to the eskimos, could quote Shakespeare chapter and verse. Knew all the mythology and classics. He was a real charmer. Nightmare on wheels though. He got back in touch recently, after almost 20 years and is still the same, and it works, until it doesn’t.
Not all of us that show vulnerability fit this pattern, though, it needs to be said.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 10, 2019 7:48:51 GMT
My ex best mate was like this. Silver tongue, could sell ice to the eskimos, could quote Shakespeare chapter and verse. Knew all the mythology and classics. He was a real charmer. Nightmare on wheels though. He got back in touch recently, after almost 20 years and is still the same, and it works, until it doesn’t. Not all of us that show vulnerability fit this pattern, though, it needs to be said. Oh, for sure! It's not the vulnerability that's the problem or tell-tale sign. It's that it's all style over substance and self-absorption mixed with deflection. "He was a real charmer... and, it works, until it doesn't" is a great description.
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Dec 10, 2019 18:09:04 GMT
Never heard of Softboi before, interesting...
Urban Dictionary: "Similar to a fuckboy but without the cocky attitude. The Softboy will butter a girl up by appealing to her emotions and showing a "sensitive" side long enough for her to sleep with him, whether or not he actually cares about her or not. Then, like the fuckboy, he can't/won't commit. Differs from the fuckboy because he goes for the heart and emotions rather than just the body."
But now we must not get completely paranoid either, thinking every new man we meet cannot commit!
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 10, 2019 18:41:11 GMT
But now we must not get completely paranoid either, thinking every new man we meet cannot commit! No, there's no need for paranoia. Armed with information, you can figure this out by being upfront and asking the right questions at the beginning. The softbois usually have a tumultuous dating history behind them and will be honest about it if asked, or even offer tidbits. They think it makes them sound more vulnerable and interesting. Getting their dating background coupled with being upfront and saying it if you're ideally looking for a commitment (not jumping into one but saying that's your intention in dating in general) and seeing whether or not they give real answers with consistent and aligned words/actions OR if they give deflecting non-answers that you can read into however you want will generally provide you with enough information to not get in too deep if you're looking for more.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 10, 2019 23:59:16 GMT
Many times we just don’t want to see what’s plainly there in front of us. This is the insecure attachment style struggle. I actually didn't know there were right questions when I was AP, as silly as that sounds. I thought this stuff just kept happening for some unknowable reason. While I was willing to commit, it was difficult for me to communicate vulnerably and firmly but that didn't mean I wasn't all in. So I thought asking these questions and getting wishy washy answers just meant other people were like me in this regard. Once I learned my lessons a zillion times over and figured out there were "right" questions and "right" answers, and got over my fear of abandonment / getting an answer I didn't want, it became much easier. Now I want the answers as soon as is reasonable to have a discussion (after initial getting to know someone, not too soon and too early for healthy boundaries) because it saves so much time that I don't have anymore if I ever want bio kids.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2019 10:41:29 GMT
So I thought asking these questions and getting wishy washy answers just meant other people were like me in this regard. Hm, I would think if someone was willing to ask me those questions, that would mean they were serious about me. But I can see how you may not know what to ask. Whenever I get a pause from a guy when I ask, I take that negatively. You can come up with all kinds of reasons why he may pause, but if he can't immediately say "yes, I'm ready and looking for something serious" without having to think, I'm out. I'm with you on this mostly. Of course, you need to judge why he was pausing and so forth, but if someone (esp men) isn't direct in his ask, i generally take it as he doesn't want it enough. when i first started seeing my partner, i said i want to be friends first then see how it goes, and that with him, i'm happy to stay friends if it doesn't work out. his reply was something like "I am not looking for friends, I have more than enough friends. if you want friendship as a base to build a relationship, i'm down for that. but i'm not interested in only making friends." It gave me pause and looked at him from a different light, and I had to decide also to commit to dating him without the caveat of a friendship. That said, other men have said similar things to me and i just went "ok, bye" because i felt like they only wanted to see me in a particular light for a role i.e., their girlfriend rather than see me fully as a person i.e., as a life partner.
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Dec 11, 2019 21:06:03 GMT
This is interesting. The softboi definitions I read seem to be about guys on the spectrum of Narcissism... hence all the superficial artsy/vulnerable affectations, designed to attract attention/sex. Makes sense there is no real substance to any of it, as narcissists usually only care about cultivating an image.
I guess i wanted to add that artsy, vulnerable avoidants are not all narcissists. The ones I have a real soft spot for personally have been either schizoid, or slightly aspie. The difference is they border on genius and obsession with their passions, tend to gravitate to what genuinely obsesses them rather than what's cool. There is nothing shallow about their connection to art, and it is often part of their vocabulary and sharing of their inner world. They also form deep connections with people, but those connections are rare and difficult for them to form.
If they ever come to trust you, they make reliable, loyal friends. You'll be treated very well because they find connection so difficult, that they appreciate you. I sometimes find them clingy in friendship (though Avoidant in romance).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 2:46:38 GMT
I'm with you on this mostly. Of course, you need to judge why he was pausing and so forth, but if someone (esp men) isn't direct in his ask, i generally take it as he doesn't want it enough. when i first started seeing my partner, i said i want to be friends first then see how it goes, and that with him, i'm happy to stay friends if it doesn't work out. his reply was something like "I am not looking for friends, I have more than enough friends. if you want friendship as a base to build a relationship, i'm down for that. but i'm not interested in only making friends." It gave me pause and looked at him from a different light, and I had to decide also to commit to dating him without the caveat of a friendship. That said, other men have said similar things to me and i just went "ok, bye" because i felt like they only wanted to see me in a particular light for a role i.e., their girlfriend rather than see me fully as a person i.e., as a life partner. I hear you, but I'm about 90% black and white on this. Every time I had a guy pause, I could tell it was bad news. In the example you gave, I think that guy was very direct and expressed directly what he wanted. That doesn't mean the thing he wants will fit with you and your goals (I've encountered controlling men who know exactly the role they want me to play in their life). But it is not a commitment phobe thing. i agree completely about pausing being bad news. I'm with you on this; the only pass I give is when I think he's pausing to phrase a response to what i've said. In my example, i didn't ask a straightforward qn of what he wanted, i was just chatting about what I wanted and my approach to things, and he was probably surprised at certain things I've said and needed a moment to communicate to me what he wanted. so the pause wasn't a commitment phone response. In hindsight actually, I was the commitment phobe - if asked, I always said i was looking for friends first, and if there was more, we can go from there. hahha! you're right; I think in my example, he was very direct without being pushy about it and wasn't looking at me to fill a role, but evaluating me for compatibility in various aspects. that's why it worked out well in terms of that conversation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 4:26:40 GMT
i agree completely about pausing being bad news. I'm with you on this; the only pass I give is when I think he's pausing to phrase a response to what i've said. In my example, i didn't ask a straightforward qn of what he wanted, i was just chatting about what I wanted and my approach to things, and he was probably surprised at certain things I've said and needed a moment to communicate to me what he wanted. so the pause wasn't a commitment phone response. In hindsight actually, I was the commitment phobe - if asked, I always said i was looking for friends first, and if there was more, we can go from there. hahha! you're right; I think in my example, he was very direct without being pushy about it and wasn't looking at me to fill a role, but evaluating me for compatibility in various aspects. that's why it worked out well in terms of that conversation. My last FA seemed to pause to phrase things. I honestly still don't know if he was just trying to figure out how to express his feelings or if he needed time to BS me. There were a few times he got off the phone abruptly because someone important was calling, his phone was about to die, or he was about to go through a bad spot. I now know he was lying, and I completely resent that. However, I know he needed time to think. If he had said "I need to think about this and how I feel, mind if I pause this for a bit and come back?" I would have had no problem with that. And maybe that's what he was doing. But maybe also he needed time to think of how to lie. I've been lied to so much I just can't handle it. I don't care what the reason is. It is never acceptable. So I sort of associate the pause with that. ohhh yesss i know that feeling. my ex-DA was like that too. i think at the end of the day, it just boils down to your feeling about whether he is trying to express himself or just trying to BS. with this one, I didn't feel like he was - it could go into that territory though. One big red flag for me is how many caveats there are. For example, I asked before how certain is he about me and our relationship, and his answer was "not uncertain". wtf does that mean? you're either certain or not. and the more careful the phrasing is, the bigger the red flag. the pauses can come with this need for careful phrasing to "protect" oneself, that sounds like they're giving a thoughtful response but really it's just a careful way of responding to prevent being indicted in the future.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 12, 2019 4:56:26 GMT
Has anyone ever felt in the past that they had to entertain someone to keep their attention? Yes, absolutely, and it was always one-sided. I eventually realized that meant the person was boring themselves! Because often they seem to feel empty but not reflect on working through that. They're happy with distraction until it stops working for them, and then they need novelty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 6:27:20 GMT
Mmm. I tend to attract men who are "fascinated" by the way i think.. until they realize that it takes alot of energy to keep up with me or that it could work against them (being smart also means I see through alot of their bs), then it doesn't "fascinate" them so much anymore. I think in the early stages, they find me entertaining until it gets tiring/tiresome for them because they actually just use it for entertainment/novelty but not really want it as part of their lives. it's happened enough that these days, when someone says my mind is fascinating/interesting, it's a big red flag.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 14:12:46 GMT
Mmm. I tend to attract men who are "fascinated" by the way i think.. until they realize that it takes alot of energy to keep up with me or that it could work against them (being smart also means I see through alot of their bs), then it doesn't "fascinate" them so much anymore. I think in the early stages, they find me entertaining until it gets tiring/tiresome for them because they actually just use it for entertainment/novelty but not really want it as part of their lives. it's happened enough that these days, when someone says my mind is fascinating/interesting, it's a big red flag. Whoa. I really need to think about this. Is that really a red flag? I have always valued a man appreciating my mind over my appearance. of course i value a man appreciating a mind over my appearance (but I do want to be told I'm pretty and attractive lol). it's a red flag in so far as if that's the key thing that attracts them as a novelty factor that they get tired of because it no longer amuses them - because it entertains them and not because they truly respect you for it, is compatible with it and want to keep it in their lives. It's a very fine line there that I've started noticing. Initially, they get interested because it seems like a challenge and it's fascinating because it's interesting in itself and it's different from the average. it doesn't mean that they want it consistently in their lives from a partner. As an example, my ex was way more intelligent than i am in a very specific occupation that is highly logical and rational and numbers based. he was very fascinated by me because I could match him in conversations and introduce a new angle to it. after a while when things settle down, those conversations were annoying to him because it's no longer interesting to have new perspectives and the way i think is no longer a novelty (because he got used to it). it has now become that I am combative and challenging. i'm now much more aware of this idea that my mind is fascinating - it can mean that it is used as entertainment that kept their attention and after some time, no longer entertaining. it moved then to becoming more sexual to be attractive and keep their attention, which is another issue in itself because of how devaluing and self disrespecting it can be.
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Dec 12, 2019 15:39:00 GMT
i'm now much more aware of this idea that my mind is fascinating - it can mean that it is used as entertainment that kept their attention and after some time, no longer entertaining. Isn't this equal to unsecure people finding (secure) partners boring after a while? And not specific to how to connect with their minds?
|
|