|
Post by seeking on Jun 13, 2020 0:32:01 GMT
So I'm listening to the book Love is Not Enough, and the one thing he said that really stunned me (and I wish I had thought about sooner) was that you need chemistry AND compatibility but not one without the other. Comparability without chemistry would be lackluster and dull and chemistry without compatibility, I guess that's obvious.
And that's what I was in for years.
I managed to break the cycle about 3-4 years ago after some really painful stuff and just said never again.
I'm dating, but I'm having a hard time with the chemistry part.
Chemistry for me, in recent times, has led me back to men who are avoidant, long distance, or someone I'm talking to now who is 62 and never been married and did the chemistry only thing too (like I did) ....
I'm talking to a really nice man but I don't feel chemistry. No surprises. He's really nice and available.
I feel mild chemistry with another guy who is a bit unavailable (of course), but really a nice and kind person and his unavailableness isn't clear to me. Like I maybe wonder if he has a touch of Aspbergers. ...
Anyway, I'm trying! But this feels not only hard, but a little impossible. Like I can't imagine meeting someone (I can, but feels so rare) who not only would be a stable partner, and understanding, but also available and be in a step-dad role (to my kid) but also interesting enough to "turn me on" and have that chemistry. Ugh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2020 4:32:45 GMT
I think the definition of chemistry needs some consideration. What do you define as chemistry? Usually, chemistry is taken to feel frission, passion, excitement, butterflies, nervousness etc etc etc. For me as an insecure, this "chemistry" is now a huge red flag - it usually means the other person is also unavailable somehow. And now I use it as a key indicator - my body knows almost immediately what this other person is going to be like.
I've since come to define "good" chemistry as a positive pleasant buzz that's very low key and easy. it is not.. exciting, intense, high arousal that make me nervous and shy and turned on. It, of course, needs to be pleasant and positive and there is a sense of desire of wanting more, but if there was a heightened sense of nervousness and excitement, chances are that my attachment is being triggered. as insecures, we are so used to heightened sensations and anxiety that it's become a norm for us to take it as an indicator that something relational is happening. and it is, but it probably is insecurity being triggered lol.
I'll give you some examples of my own.
i've once flew across the world to meet someone I had great chemistry online and we seem compatible. when we met, it felt like we were married for a very long time and we are comfortable as it. but it wasn't that we were comfortable with each other positively, it was more the "i've known this dude for a million years and cannot be bothered anymore" kind of comfort. The feeling was mutual and it ended there. so that was chemistry and compatibility, but completely boring chemistry that we both didnt want.
i've also once met someone on a trip and the chemistry was just explosive, and we both made efforts/considered moving to each other's countries without actually discussing plans or even speaking of these efforts to each other - we would just sort of find out through other common friends or slip-ups during texting. So that was amazing chemistry but completely crazy.
with my current partner (previously da), the chemistry is very.... mild and calm. it's comfortable without being boring, it's positive without being intense. and I would have completely missed it (just very recently turned secure then) if he has not persisted in dating. this sort of feeling was very new to me and I had just taken it as "no chemistry" or that "it's kinda boring", precisely because I was so used to the intense sizzling that made me feel alive. I asked him before why he persisted, and he said he doesnt know but there was something and he was curious what that "something" was - he leans DA and I think he also felt quite weirded out by this chemistry. This chemistry made it possible for me to function everyday and still experience a low-key positive buzz, which is quite nice because it "added" to the day, not "highlight" of the day. I think that made it easier for me to run my own life without feeling like it's being taken over by the relationship/person, and that was what I had wanted for myself. this was not immediately apparent to me, but we discuss this very frequently which helps concretize these thoughts.
I will urge you to think about what chemistry means to you, and what kind of chemistry you want to experience in a relationship. So perhaps think about how you want to feel everyday if you are in a LT relationship, and then try to create those "feelings" consistently through other experiences, so that you can recognise it when you see it.
good luck! dating can be a difficult process indeed.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 13, 2020 18:54:23 GMT
Wow, ShiningStar this is SO well put and really helps!
I'm going to have to think about this LOTS more but it is a great way of looking for it.
At first thought, bad chemistry for me used to look like a certain "type" (physically) and then a certain air of arrogance, distance, a little bit of "rejection" mixed in there, a certain quick wit/intelligence.
Now, I think the first two things that come to mind (and I would be interested in anyone's input on this too) are inspiration and respect. I feel like I need to "look up to" someone in a way and that may look like financial success, a certain type of intelligence, someone doing really amazing work in the world, someone really passionate about his job and motivated and creating great things. That feels like such a huge turn on for me.
And of the men I'm talking to now that is not present. One works at a restaurant. (Manages, but still nothing that really turns me on there about what he's going with his life). Another semi-retired/currently unemployed, looking for a job, and the other hasn't not met those requirements, but he's not really super available? so I don't even know.
Is this stuff I'm missing in myself that I'm looking for in someone else? Is this reasonable to want in terms of chemistry?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2020 0:11:24 GMT
Wow, ShiningStar this is SO well put and really helps! I'm going to have to think about this LOTS more but it is a great way of looking for it. At first thought, bad chemistry for me used to look like a certain "type" (physically) and then a certain air of arrogance, distance, a little bit of "rejection" mixed in there, a certain quick wit/intelligence. Now, I think the first two things that come to mind (and I would be interested in anyone's input on this too) are inspiration and respect. I feel like I need to "look up to" someone in a way and that may look like financial success, a certain type of intelligence, someone doing really amazing work in the world, someone really passionate about his job and motivated and creating great things. That feels like such a huge turn on for me.
And of the men I'm talking to now that is not present. One works at a restaurant. (Manages, but still nothing that really turns me on there about what he's going with his life). Another semi-retired/currently unemployed, looking for a job, and the other hasn't not met those requirements, but he's not really super available? so I don't even know. Is this stuff I'm missing in myself that I'm looking for in someone else? Is this reasonable to want in terms of chemistry? my advice is to stay away from "forms" and focus on "feelings". respecting someone is a fundamental criteria for any relationship to work, in my opinion, but that respect should not be based on achievements. Then you're definitely going to run into many DAs because they tend to be relatively high achieving but not quite available. wanting to look up to someone is also not a great thing to "want", just think about what that looks like already! there are 2 key things here. 1 - you can be very successful, even if you're doing charity work, by being a complete dick to someone else. Do not focus on the outcome, focus on the traits/processes that got him there. how did he become successful? because he was a workaholic and/or was obsessed with his work? what would that mean for you as a partner? was he a complete dick and knew how to step on others to get ahead? does he think of everything in business terms? it will spill over to you and you need to know if that's what you want for yourself. 2 - if you're successful what you are looking for is someone equally successful, whatever that version of success is. Do you already look up to yourself and respect what you have achieved? what do you need to look up to him for? successful people can give you good advice, but so can unsuccessful wise people. why do you need him to have success? I'm not shitting on this, because I'm rather snobby myself and I do care if my partner has a reasonable amount of success/ambition/work ethic. LOL. but I think it is important to explain to yourself why you want that person to be successful - and if that "why" is a good thing to have in a partner. My past partners (the ones I'm most attached to) are also highly successful at work - my last one being a MD of a MNC, but that was an absolutedisaster. I was very attracted to his mind and work ethic and success, because I felt like that was someone I could look up to and respect, and that he has done it all and can advise me in navigating through work/life. It absolutely sucks. Now, I think of it as...would you want to date your intern? I think the key is to really build a life you are content and happy with, and be someone you can look up to, and then find someone who can match your standards of what you think makes a good life.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 15, 2020 2:39:55 GMT
This is interesting and I'll come back to this tomorrow.
I will say that I was thinking earlier that I better be careful b/c it might mean a lot of ego.
I can easily not respect someone - if they don't have a good work ethic, if they're working "beneath" themselves - like the guy managing a restaurant.
I lost a really good guy years ago b/c of this. He didn't have a job, and I wanted to start a family. I regret it - and have for years. But at the time, I didn't think I could respect someone who wasn't earning to support us and our family. I'd be resentful.
It's tricky though b/c it could be anything. One of the guys I'm talking to now I'm sure he's smart and successful at work but his mom lives with him and that makes me a little ... worried. (He's a single dad of two kids, but still).
I always thought if I met someone like me - whose been through what I've been through and grown and works their butts off and has done it alone, etc, they'll have earned my respect. It doesn't need to be job success. Financial helps.
The last guy who "earned it" was definitely DA/ghosted me.
Lots to think about... more soon. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 15, 2020 11:49:08 GMT
Woah, so last night, for whatever reason I could not stop thinking about the last DA. To the point where I almost wrote to him (didn't, thankfully). But what is that? I decided he was "perfect" and kept going over in my mind what happened (I still don't really know only can guess).
Also, what is the deal with a DA who suddenly ghosts - hot and cold? They get spooked or something?
But, in thinking about him, he did have my respect and whenever he said something that threatened to lose it, I freaked out. So I'm realizing this respect thing is big for me. Like I really fear losing respect b/c then I think it's over....
I loved how he supported a child that wasn't even his. He still does. I love that he did it from his heart and showed his loyalty. He was financially successful and it wasn't so much his job or career or success at work, but that he had that financial stability (I do not) (and this may be where he fled). I liked that he was the same astrological sign as me and related to work ethic and organized home, etc. It felt like a lot of compatibility and chemistry.
Or maybe it was just me sniffing out the old usual DA.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2020 12:08:05 GMT
is it really respect, or just feeling like he is reliable/dependable and can provide you what you do not have e.g., financial stability?
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 15, 2020 13:44:41 GMT
ShiningStar, good question, but I think the answer is both.
Providing with what I do not have - a partner, a coparent/father figure for child, financial support, etc is a definite. But I couldn't have that without the respect piece (admiration, shared values, etc).
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jun 15, 2020 19:46:40 GMT
seeking, I'm noticing that all your descriptions are of what people are (through their accomplishments, maybe a few actions) and what they can provide for you, but nothing about who they are (such as character, values, personality traits) or what they may want. It seems very much like a check-box list, where you're not exactly open to being curious, open, and objective to get to know them for them (they just need to check the boxes). This may not be the case and may just be the side you're writing about, but I used to do that and had to shift into all the things @shiningstar was talking about. Because I eventually realized that what I felt as "chemistry" (including sexual chemistry) was feeling emotional overwhelm from my AP attachment wounds being activated (which was all about me, meaning in this way I was not really very emotionally available, though none of that was conscious to me)... and who does this but avoidants? And add to that I had my own checkbox list like this of what I found minimally acceptable to try to control my relationships (these checkboxes will = stability / them being less likely to engulf or leave me) that I'd gotten externally, from societal ideals and expectations, because I didn't connect with my own needs well enough to know what I wanted or what actually worked or was healthy. So I wasn't confident in just being open and available and slowly getting to know someone and build an authentic connection. The chemistry was always attachment issues and patterns playing out meets fantasy bonding, sprinkled with AP / anxious side of FA believes longing is love (it's not). So, some deep things here, but food for thought.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 15, 2020 21:14:45 GMT
Alexandra, so what does chemistry look like for you now if not coming from the attachment parts?
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jun 16, 2020 0:30:37 GMT
seeking, it's slow, calm, and just about sharing a connection without other layers and agendas. Adding without consuming. But that wasn't possible for me until I got more secure with myself and didn't project other layers and agendas onto my partners, seeking their regulation or validation or whatever. @shiningstar and I both shared more about this in another thread (though I'm no longer seeing the guy I was talking about). jebkinnisonforum.com/thread/2598/secure-partner-traits
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 17, 2020 13:42:02 GMT
Just some observations from few days.
I know I used to be super anxious. But I'm still confused about that b/c now I can seem so avoidant. Isn't it 2 sides of the same coin? Fear of intimacy because either way you're afraid of intimacy (anxious with someone who was avoidant).
I'm talking to a bunch of guys from online. A lot at once. I can do a lot of observing and I see how quick I will shut down. My therapist is trying to encourage me to speak up, have boundaries, etc. And don't outright dismiss someone but start to use boundaries to "teach them" in a way how to be with me. She thinks I'm going to need someone with a lot of "stamina" she says and someone who isn't sensitive to my physiology - which is kind of highly changeable, so that they don't get their abandonment stuff triggered when I'm always pulling away.
Ha! Tall order, I guess.
She said I seem to want someone who is 100% on my life path even though I'm dating men in their 40s and 50s. That they've been on their life paths of years (she's basically saying it's unrealistic).
So anyway, a nice guy I was talking to but turns out to be "too nice" almost like he is appeasing me. That turns me off immediately. We also had a few emails, 1 phone convo and a couple texts and haven't met yet and I'm getting "good morning" emails every morning. sometimes before 8 am! What the heck is that? Why do guys do this? For me, that is reserved for like well into dating when you know someone's schedule and you've been intimate with them. He also says "hi beautiful" even though he's only ever seen photos of me and "I can't wait to talk again" (and wanted to talk to me the day after our first convo).
Is this normal? Red flag?
Guy #2 is chill. We can go days without texting and he doesn't seem to take it personally. I see him online - he's still out there looking. But based on our conversations, he has a lot of disorganized attachment. He seems to go after women who treat him poorly. He still stays hooked into them long after they are gone.
Guy # 3 I just like. But his energy is sooooo slow for me. My therapist thinks he is a bit on the spectrum and says "You don't need more of that," because I have a child and an ex with Asperger's. He's an odd guy. He will go weeks without texting. And then text. And tell me he just got diagnosed with Lyme, and I'll give him some tips, and then he'll send me a video of him playing piano. Etc. But it's like ... ? What are we doing? It has a friends vibe but that is fine. I'm most physically attracted to him on paper. His mom lives with him <------ that worries me! Even though he is a single dad and has his boys most of the time (ex lives in another state). I am not judging it but... but then suddenly he'll surprise me and say he's gonna call me and he does. I missed him last night, so he left a message to say he's going to call tonight. A little pursuit in him feels good, feels fine (doesn't' scare me into shutting down)
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Jun 17, 2020 13:44:36 GMT
more....
Guy # 4 I was browsing online and I saw a guy and clicked on him. He apparently had already liked me. I probably ruled him out but had a second thought now that I am able to not have so much instant terror around very male men (lots of trauma there). So suddenly, I was like "Oh, it's nice to feel attracted to a man-man) I liked him and I think I thought that his profile was no longer active, so I got really instantly panicked. Like that high value you give to someone who goes away. I observed that. I found him on another dating site and liked him there (bad move for me). But still observing. And then I got an email from him on the first site saying "hi" - I said "hey" - we did this back and forth and he said he wanted to meet. And I was like Woah. So I remembered my therapist, boundaries. I did that. I said, No call first? Would you be up for that? So we exchanged numbers and I got a text from him instantly. I was out most of yesterday so I didn't really respond back much. The texting was normal. Last night, I got home and felt a few red flags and went into panic - not like full-blown panic (my observer self was still online, but barely).
One of the things he said was "Are you sure you have time to date, with kids" or something like that. First of all I have one kid. And second of all, is that your business? It wreaked to me of someone really needy. And my kid is such a big priority in my life and is only 10, so someone who comes into my life is going to be a part of her life too. Not push her out.
Another thing he said is "so multiple dating sites woman, I bet you are sifting through a bunch of emails."
And another: "I don't like a long delay having a lot of phone calls and texting. Generally prefer meeting." And then he wrote "maybe this weekend."
Backing up, he also told me where he would be last night (at a bar) and what time (4 pm) which felt odd. When he texted me from there I was at my sister's and he said he was there b/c of some work getting done at his house and that he was there "alone, mind you."
And another: "Shame you spent money for (other dating site), plan to get your butt off there."
And another: "I'm actually looking to date ONE person with zero distractions. I may go back on (dating site) but it will be to look at your pics. Other than that not interested." And "You may have to send me some." "You are cute."
This last one was a HUGE red flag for me, and sent me into a tailspin.
And, of course, this morning at 8 am I get the dreaded "good morning" text.
This is where I would freak out, shut down, panic, block. What boundary can I even have with this person? How do you explain to someone like no this isn't how this works? Or "teach them" how to behave around you.
So is this me being avoidant or me being secure/normal? And him being psycho? Lol.
BTW, he is "Online now" On the dating site!?! Not that I care. I'm not stalking him, but funny that he says that and is online.
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jun 17, 2020 13:54:45 GMT
Just some observations from few days. I know I used to be super anxious. But I'm still confused about that b/c now I can seem so avoidant. Isn't it 2 sides of the same coin? Fear of intimacy because either way you're afraid of intimacy (anxious with someone who was avoidant). I'm talking to a bunch of guys from online. A lot at once. I can do a lot of observing and I see how quick I will shut down. My therapist is trying to encourage me to speak up, have boundaries, etc. And don't outright dismiss someone but start to use boundaries to "teach them" in a way how to be with me. She thinks I'm going to need someone with a lot of "stamina" she says and someone who isn't sensitive to my physiology - which is kind of highly changeable, so that they don't get their abandonment stuff triggered when I'm always pulling away. Ha! Tall order, I guess. She said I seem to want someone who is 100% on my life path even though I'm dating men in their 40s and 50s. That they've been on their life paths of years (she's basically saying it's unrealistic). So anyway, a nice guy I was talking to but turns out to be "too nice" almost like he is appeasing me. That turns me off immediately. We also had a few emails, 1 phone convo and a couple texts and haven't met yet and I'm getting "good morning" emails every morning. sometimes before 8 am! What the heck is that? Why do guys do this? For me, that is reserved for like well into dating when you know someone's schedule and you've been intimate with them. He also says "hi beautiful" even though he's only ever seen photos of me and "I can't wait to talk again" (and wanted to talk to me the day after our first convo). Is this normal? Red flag? He sounds anxious...too early to tell if he is AP, FA or just really really keen.....but yes, that is a red flag and a great opportunity to start communicating boundaries. “Hi, thanks for reaching out, I appreciate the compliments and early morning texts, but we don’t really know each other yet. Let’s talk a bit more in a more casual fashion to see if we are compatible”.Guy #2 is chill. We can go days without texting and he doesn't seem to take it personally. I see him online - he's still out there looking. But based on our conversations, he has a lot of disorganized attachment. He seems to go after women who treat him poorly. He still stays hooked into them long after they are gone. Guy # 3 I just like. But his energy is sooooo slow for me. My therapist thinks he is a bit on the spectrum and says "You don't need more of that," because I have a child and an ex with Asperger's. He's an odd guy. He will go weeks without texting. And then text. And tell me he just got diagnosed with Lyme, and I'll give him some tips, and then he'll send me a video of him playing piano. Etc. But it's like ... ? What are we doing? It has a friends vibe but that is fine. I'm most physically attracted to him on paper. His mom lives with him <------ that worries me! Even though he is a single dad and has his boys most of the time (ex lives in another state). I am not judging it but... but then suddenly he'll surprise me and say he's gonna call me and he does. I missed him last night, so he left a message to say he's going to call tonight. A little pursuit in him feels good, feels fine (doesn't' scare me into shutting down)
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jun 17, 2020 14:02:41 GMT
more.... Guy # 4 I was browsing online and I saw a guy and clicked on him. He apparently had already liked me. I probably ruled him out but had a second thought now that I am able to not have so much instant terror around very male men (lots of trauma there). So suddenly, I was like "Oh, it's nice to feel attracted to a man-man) I liked him and I think I thought that his profile was no longer active, so I got really instantly panicked. Like that high value you give to someone who goes away. I observed that. I found him on another dating site and liked him there (bad move for me). But still observing. And then I got an email from him on the first site saying "hi" - I said "hey" - we did this back and forth and he said he wanted to meet. And I was like Woah. So I remembered my therapist, boundaries. I did that. I said, No call first? Would you be up for that? So we exchanged numbers and I got a text from him instantly. I was out most of yesterday so I didn't really respond back much. The texting was normal. Last night, I got home and felt a few red flags and went into panic - not like full-blown panic (my observer self was still online, but barely). One of the things he said was "Are you sure you have time to date, with kids" or something like that. First of all I have one kid. And second of all, is that your business? It wreaked to me of someone really needy. And my kid is such a big priority in my life and is only 10, so someone who comes into my life is going to be a part of her life too. Not push her out. Another thing he said is "so multiple dating sites woman, I bet you are sifting through a bunch of emails." And another: "I don't like a long delay having a lot of phone calls and texting. Generally prefer meeting." And then he wrote "maybe this weekend." Backing up, he also told me where he would be last night (at a bar) and what time (4 pm) which felt odd. When he texted me from there I was at my sister's and he said he was there b/c of some work getting done at his house and that he was there "alone, mind you." And another: "Shame you spent money for (other dating site), plan to get your butt off there." And another: "I'm actually looking to date ONE person with zero distractions. I may go back on (dating site) but it will be to look at your pics. Other than that not interested." And "You may have to send me some." "You are cute." This last one was a HUGE red flag for me, and sent me into a tailspin. And, of course, this morning at 8 am I get the dreaded "good morning" text. This is where I would freak out, shut down, panic, block. What boundary can I even have with this person? How do you explain to someone like no this isn't how this works? Or "teach them" how to behave around you. So is this me being avoidant or me being secure/normal? And him being psycho? Lol. BTW, he is "Online now" On the dating site!?! Not that I care. I'm not stalking him, but funny that he says that and is online. So...not sure if this is all guy 4 or back to guy 1 at the end....regardless....it isn’t about teaching another person....it is about stating your needs. For guy 4 I would simply say “hi there, it seems to me that we are not compatible as I am looking for someone to share in my life, which means, I have other priorities outside of the relationship...such as taking care of my child. While I have appreciated our email exchange, I believe we are looking for 2 different things. I wish you well.” There isn’t a need to call out his bad behavior....especially if you know he is not for you. Let the next girl he talks to deal with that. All you have to do is state that the two of you are not compatible and move along on your merry way.
|
|