|
Post by learningalongtheway on Jun 7, 2017 18:35:49 GMT
Do other DAs on this board feel that relationships aren't worth the effort? I often feel that I will never be able to meet the needs of partners in a relationship, and tbay most people only care about doing things for others as a way to make themselves feel good. I understand that disconnection from other is stressful and lonely, but I honestly don't see another option.
Most people are dissapointed in their relationships with me, mostly because I'm not good at them. I believe there is value is focusing on what I'm good at, and what I'm best at are research science, math, programming etc. I think that focusing on these skills would be beneficial to people/humans in the long term and not require me to invest heavily in a relationship.
In summary, I've come to realize that individuals only care about what you do for them. Since, Im not good at being valuable to someone in a relationship context, I am choosing to focus on doing things for humanity as a whole. Does this make sense and do other DAs feel this way?
|
|
|
Post by gaynxious on Jun 7, 2017 22:42:39 GMT
I'm not a DA but my father is and I know that for the most part he and my mother had a very good relationship. My mother was a secure, although she did confess some things to me that now make me think at times my dad did make her anxious but she likely had enough internal security and self esteem where she retained her secure attachment. My father certainly had strong romantic feelings for my mother, he often described their relationship as 'story book' and was very grateful to have her. He dated quite a few anxious women before her and one after that gave him a pretty negative view of relationships. I also know that some 'research' that I have never found but is often mentioned shows that avoidant-secure relationships are just as satisfying as secure-secure relationships. (I suspect there may be some selection bias, i.e. Avoidant - secure couples need to be somewhat successful just to last long enough to be captured by studies, etc) I have had trouble reconciling these findings with jeb's showing the population skews avoidant quickly as you get older. But from listening to a few self aware avoidants on here I think we can glean a few things. Avoidants must avoid anxious partners just as much as anxious must avoid avoidants. We are just not good for each other. Avoidant's must be aware of their triggers and at times do things for the relationship even if they don't want to. Avoidants must try to communicate effectively and tactfully their needs.
I'd also say that like anxious people you should be upfront about your needs. Even if it weeds out desirable partners, it likely also weeds out partners that would be unhappy with you. My father cites my mothers ability to be comfortable sitting quietly for a long time in seperate rooms. You may need the same or similar in a partner.
However, it is totally legitimate for a DA, or anyone really, to find relationships are not worth the work. All relationships require effort some less than others but some people may just never feel like they get more than they put in. That's an individual calculation. Best of luck!
|
|
|
Post by anonymous10 on Jun 13, 2017 15:20:55 GMT
Hey there! In response to your post OP, I can understand that these thoughts would be very isolating. Obviously, that is not considered 'the norm' by the majority of society but I do respect your ability to come to terms with something and accept it for what it is so pragmatically... HOWEVER, whilst it might be easy to fawn off forming relationships/connections with others because you are "not good at being valuable to someone" I fear that you are ignoring the real issue. Firstly, there is no such thing as 'not being valuable to someone'. If someone is in a relationship with you, they value you (generally). You have strong tendencies/behaviours which may hurt others and thus you cause disappointment, but it is NOT that you are fundamentally invaluable and "no good" at it. Do you not believe that some relationships are worth trying to break those tendencies? You will see that if you truly, allow intimacy to form, that you will flourish in ways you didn't know possible and be even better off to society as well as transforming both your life and someone else's. If you feel disinterested in that then maybe you haven't met someone worth it yet. Interesting that you view love as "people only doing things for others as a way to make them feel good" - it is a very cynical way to view relationships. I don't believe that is true. I believe that true love and intimacy are completely selfless. Have you had many relationships with the anxious type? Often their gestures of 'love' are overbearing shows of affection as a way to feel better because they are so insecure... maybe in your past experience, it is your avoidance that lead your partners to act in a way to 'manipulate' the relationship so that they feel more reassured, that you will remain with them, and that you aren't going anywhere and that, is not true intimacy. And perhaps.. these relationships were superficial, and your engagement with each other was a projection of your own needs to feel good etc etc. You will find that a person with secure attachment (healthy self esteem and all) will show their love in a way that is not toxic or so 'mechanical' as you described it. Just some food for thought.
|
|
|
Post by mrscuba on Jun 13, 2017 16:50:20 GMT
Do other DAs on this board feel that relationships aren't worth the effort? I often feel that I will never be able to meet the needs of partners in a relationship, and tbay most people only care about doing things for others as a way to make themselves feel good. I understand that disconnection from other is stressful and lonely, but I honestly don't see another option. Most people are dissapointed in their relationships with me, mostly because I'm not good at them. I believe there is value is focusing on what I'm good at, and what I'm best at are research science, math, programming etc. I think that focusing on these skills would be beneficial to people/humans in the long term and not require me to invest heavily in a relationship. In summary, I've come to realize that individuals only care about what you do for them. Since, Im not good at being valuable to someone in a relationship context, I am choosing to focus on doing things for humanity as a whole. Does this make sense and do other DAs feel this way? Though you are admittedly avoidant, I feel that you may not be having an open enough mind with the right kind of secure people. I admit I lean on the secure/anxious type myself but my ex girlfriend whom is fearful avoidant have become best of friends and she's been able to establish value in trusting me and communicating her feelings much better. She still feels "horrible at relationships" but I've encouraged her to be open and free with me and it's taught her that you can see the world differently even with avoidant attachments and slowly learn how to feel more stable while still feeling the comfort of security. The only thing I wish had happened with my fearful avoidant ex was that she just communicated her feelings a little more so I knew when things were bottling up inside. It also didn't help that she felt that simple mundane things like going to the grocery store was something that couldn't be shared for fear of losing independence. The point I'm trying to make is that my experiences in dating a few avoidants is that they are usually wonderful people but just take a while to be able to communicate with you. They are amazingly in the beginning and once they feel pressures from the relationship they start to become their avoidant selves.
|
|
|
Post by learningalongtheway on Jun 13, 2017 23:33:42 GMT
I'd also say that like anxious people you should be upfront about your needs. Even if it weeds out desirable partners, it likely also weeds out partners that would be unhappy with you. My father cites my mothers ability to be comfortable sitting quietly for a long time in seperate rooms. You may need the same or similar in a partner. However, it is totally legitimate for a DA, or anyone really, to find relationships are not worth the work. All relationships require effort some less than others but some people may just never feel like they get more than they put in. That's an individual calculation. Best of luck! . Thank you for your responses. I agree that I should be more upfront about my needs in a relationship. I think it's just more difficult as a woman; intro version is not valued. People barely like stoic men. If you have any suggestions how to tactfully communicate the need for space, let me know
|
|
|
Post by gaynxious on Jun 14, 2017 4:25:53 GMT
i actually hear men complain about anxious women a lot. Over bearing, controlling, needy, etc. I would think many might find an avoidant appealing as they would have more freedom and fewer expectations. But perhaps because it is less common an avoidant woman may seem cold and like they don't care.
I would think for straight couples it would be easier to negotiate time apart because you already have the socially acceptable girls night and guys night. Also, more options of destinations for each to make 'their place'.
My ex used to just need a lot of alone time and once that was communicated, I didn't like it but I became less bothered by it. But before it was communicated it really hurt my feelings. I think communicating without tact is still better than not communicating.
If it's apart time you need maybe develop some hobbies and don't specifically go after men that pursue those hobbies. I found it way easier to be apart from my ex when he was doing things I didn't enjoy, i.e. politics or documentaries. It felt less like he was trying to get away from me and more like I was choosing not to be with him because I didn't want to be there.
Unfortunately, as an anxious, at some level there was no correct way for him to express his needs to me. The way he felt about me was not the way I wanted a partner to feel about me. The way he felt about me was why we shouldn't have been together. But maybe if we had communicated more we would have figured that out sooner and much less painfully. But maybe with a secure partner there won't be those feelings or maybe those feelings would be ok. Sadly, as much as I admire some of the avoidants here and as much insight as I have gained through reading, I feel I can never understand the avoidant's world fully and therefore my empathy and ability to relate is limited. Maybe another avoidant could help me tackling this communication issue?
|
|
sam
Junior Member
Posts: 60
|
Post by sam on Jun 14, 2017 6:43:49 GMT
Mrscuba I agree with some of what you say, my ex was so different at the start and unrecognisable at the end. In hindsight the signs of avoidant were there at the start but not so obvious and at the time I knew nothing about the attachment types but by the end wow it was horrendous! I'm guessing your ex can now open up to you because you are no longer together and the threat of getting closer as a couple isn't there.
|
|
|
Post by mrscuba on Jun 14, 2017 10:49:05 GMT
Mrscuba I agree with some of what you say, my ex was so different at the start and unrecognisable at the end. In hindsight the signs of avoidant were there at the start but not so obvious and at the time I knew nothing about the attachment types but by the end wow it was horrendous! I'm guessing your ex can now open up to you because you are no longer together and the threat of getting closer as a couple isn't there. Hey Sam, I guess I meant in the present with your knowledge of attachment theory and all. My ex I think got closer to me partly because she didn't have to feel like she was living to a high standard of commitment she felt suffocated by and felt inadequate by somehow. However from our discussions is seems that she's gotten closer to me because I've stuck around and was willing to be her close friend after she ended things. In her experience once things end she would just accept no more contact or the other person would hate her and become an enemy. It's almost like I passed some kind of initiation or something in her world lol. I think it's easier for me to be friends with her since she doesn't like to date and she said she just won't be able to do it for the very long foreseeable future. So there isn't another guy in the pic. I however have gone on a few dates and she seems like she doesn't care but she is apparently very afraid of me committing to someone else for fear that she will no longer have the closeness we have. Sometimes I wonder if it's just the only type of relationship she can actually handle. She was married before but it ended after the guy cheated on her because he felt she was always so distant and felt unloved. Since her avoidant tendencies come across to people that are close to her like she is hiding something or keeping something from you she's actually very loyal! I think those tendencies are to keep up a sense of independence. I find it funny when I catch her hiding the tiniest details like that she stopped at Starbucks on her way home from work but told me she just went straight home... I later go into Starbucks and the barista that knows us both kindly says he saw her there earlier and asked if I wasn't bribing her "another one of the usual today". Things like that I think are bizarre but are apparently normal to a lot of avoidants i have met. Combine this with her undying sense of inadequacy and low stress tolerance and she can be a total mess bordering on mean and sometimes verbally/emotionally abusive. It's interesting because she craves connection and closeness but hates how she feels when she gets it. There's nothing wrong with being an avoidant in my opinion but it just seems many avoidants are somewhat tortured souls once you really get to know them. Maybe that's more of the fearful avoidant types but I've also noticed that fearful avoidants can become dismissive avoidants when they feel suffocated. Ultimately I guess I'd like to encourage you to possibly not just assume that you as an avoidant have to do the world justice by being alone unless you absolutely want to. I can see how feeling like dating is a struggle because you feel you aren't good at it but maybe do you honestly Think you've put in as much effort to making a change as possible to maybe become more secure with who you are and how you feel about others in terms of closeness? I often wonder if it's sometimes as simple of an approach as "practice makes perfect"?
|
|
sam
Junior Member
Posts: 60
|
Post by sam on Jun 14, 2017 15:00:13 GMT
Sorry, the way I wrote that it sounded like I was avoidant, I'm not. It was my ex that was avoidant. I'm secure, but as time went on his avoidant behaviour caused me to become anxious. I don't have any problems with relationships but being with him caused me a massive amount of stress.
|
|
|
Post by learningalongtheway on Jun 16, 2017 4:32:01 GMT
Hey there! In response to your post OP, I can understand that these thoughts would be very isolating. Obviously, that is not considered 'the norm' by the majority of society but I do respect your ability to come to terms with something and accept it for what it is so pragmatically... HOWEVER, whilst it might be easy to fawn off forming relationships/connections with others because you are "not good at being valuable to someone" I fear that you are ignoring the real issue. Firstly, there is no such thing as 'not being valuable to someone'. If someone is in a relationship with you, they value you (generally). You have strong tendencies/behaviours which may hurt others and thus you cause disappointment, but it is NOT that you are fundamentally invaluable and "no good" at it. Do you not believe that some relationships are worth trying to break those tendencies? You will see that if you truly, allow intimacy to form, that you will flourish in ways you didn't know possible and be even better off to society as well as transforming both your life and someone else's. If you feel disinterested in that then maybe you haven't met someone worth it yet. Interesting that you view love as "people only doing things for others as a way to make them feel good" - it is a very cynical way to view relationships. I don't believe that is true. I believe that true love and intimacy are completely selfless. Have you had many relationships with the anxious type? Often their gestures of 'love' are overbearing shows of affection as a way to feel better because they are so insecure... maybe in your past experience, it is your avoidance that lead your partners to act in a way to 'manipulate' the relationship so that they feel more reassured, that you will remain with them, and that you aren't going anywhere and that, is not true intimacy. And perhaps.. these relationships were superficial, and your engagement with each other was a projection of your own needs to feel good etc etc. You will find that a person with secure attachment (healthy self esteem and all) will show their love in a way that is not toxic or so 'mechanical' as you described it. Just some food for thought. I'v never run away from relationships without voicing my concerns first. In my experience, when I draw a boundary for my partner's behavior, that boundary is always violated. Subsequently, the partner feels that because they "did something for me" I should ignore their hurtful behavior. Second, many people I have dated as well as individuals in this forum describe their past partners as a "waste of time and money". Those are the reasons I feel that relations are transactional. I feel like so many people "do things" (buy flowers, presents etc..) but half the time they don't even listen to their partners take the time the talk to them. How can they expect a relationship to flourish? My ex would ask me how I felt about something, and if I didn't answer, he would start talking or change the subject. Why ask the question if you're not going to take the time to listen?
|
|