|
Post by seeking on Apr 16, 2020 13:39:10 GMT
A secure would walk in the very beginning stages as soon as someone shows up hot/cold and inconsistent. They don’t waste their time and energy pursuing someone who isn’t showing up fir them bc a secure knows their worth. Let him go. Filtering out the bad ones early is the best way to go. I'm starting to see this now, but this also perfectly sums up my work. Last night, even though I'm talking to someone new (in fact, now 2 new people - 1 more promising than the other), I still found myself "drifting back" to him. And then I remembered those texts he sent me. The "Sitting in a chair for hours and hours." I realized it wasn't even thought it confused me, as I had stated, but it was off-putting. Like I'm a super busy single mom in a pandemic, with a child home, trying to juggle self-employment, and that's all you can say to me? Not even ask how I am? It's definitely my "dad stuff" - but it also made me grateful that he and I are no longer in contact. Onward.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Apr 16, 2020 22:51:03 GMT
It doesn't matter of you came from a broken background or will never have enough resources and beauty to feel secure. The only thing that matters is learning to pick good people IMO. I agree this matters a lot, but whether or not it's the only thing that matters depends on your goal. Is your only goal having a secure(-ish) romantic relationship? Then yes, your choice of partner matters most, because you don't want someone who will continuously trigger you unnecessarily. Or is your goal to earn secure? If it's to have a secure relationship AND earn secure, to feel more at peace with yourself and life overall, then it's about choosing a stable person with good character but also continuing self-work and not seeing the romantic relationship as a means to an end. This is equally important, because people with insecure attachment styles will continue to cope with stress in unhealthy ways and trigger themselves. It isn't only the interaction with a partner that causes triggering and maladaptive behaviors in self. It's the historic and not fully processed life trauma, as well. But in both cases, choice of partner is a big part of the equation.
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Apr 17, 2020 1:17:05 GMT
It doesn't matter of you came from a broken background or will never have enough resources and beauty to feel secure. The only thing that matters is learning to pick good people IMO. I agree this matters a lot, but whether or not it's the only thing that matters depends on your goal. Is your only goal having a secure(-ish) romantic relationship? Then yes, your choice of partner matters most, because you don't want someone who will continuously trigger you unnecessarily. Or is your goal to earn secure? If it's to have a secure relationship AND earn secure, to feel more at peace with yourself and life overall, then it's about choosing a stable person with good character but also continuing self-work and not seeing the romantic relationship as a means to an end. This is equally important, because people with insecure attachment styles will continue to cope with stress in unhealthy ways and trigger themselves. It isn't only the interaction with a partner that causes triggering and maladaptive behaviors in self. It's the historic and not fully processed life trauma, as well. But in both cases, choice of partner is a big part of the equation. I like the way you put that, Alexandra. I agree that managing and understanding our own personal triggers in a healthy way does lead to more inner peace, more accountability, with less blame directed towards others or self. I'm unsure that I equate this with security exactly, although I think I understand how you mean it. Security to me is tangible things that make you secure. The foundations of Maslows Hierachy, for example....physiological needs, safety, love and belonging. Less essential are self esteem and self actualisation, but we tend to move towards those when our fundermental security needs are met. I do see your point that poor managment of triggers can undermine security in so many ways, not just relationships.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Apr 18, 2020 14:04:24 GMT
Serenity, your help is soooo appreciated! This is brilliant and helps so much. Thank you!!!!!
Some people are only pushed harder into their general overall attachment style by romantic partners or family members, but perhaps not friends. If you test secure with friends, how do you feel and approach that differently (and perhaps more securely) when you meet brand new people platonically? Do you excitedly project, fixate, or perhaps nitpick? Or is it calmer and simpler than your response to a potential romantic partner? If friendships unfold more organically and don't trigger you either anxious or avoidant, then you can think about a secure romantic situation unfolding similarly.
This is BRILLIANT! So incredibly helpful. I "get it" now!!
It's about being excited to get to know the person better rather than relating more directly with being excited or turned off by ruminating over how they seem able to potentially meet or not meet your needs.
So as a single mom this is coming through all the time: Would he be a good dad? Could I live with him? Is he supportive? etc. I directly do this with men I meet. Is that not normal/okay/SA?
You doing both, btw, is one of the things I've picked out that indicates you may be FA.
Both of what?
It's not uncommon for people to believe they're AP but they're actually FA. This is because some people really gravitate towards a certain type of other person and a certain type of dynamic. It might be repeating an unfulfilling childhood relationship dynamic you're unconsciously trying to fix, or it might simply be that it's a dynamic that feels very familiar and mirrors something you're used to (even if it's unhealthy or dysfunctional).
I guess some of the reasons I thought I was AP was when I literally *threw myself* at my ex who was super avoid-ant. I would call him a lot. He definitely triggered a very AP thing in me. But the fact that I was even with him suggests that I may be FA b/c he is so DA.
And the fact that the guy who ghosted me 2 weeks ago, I keep thinking about him. Like I want to write to him. (I won't.) but why am I even thinking about that idiot? That bothers me!
So if you're someone who tends to feel like you click more with avoidants, then you're far more likely to stay on the anxious side because that's the dynamic an FA will feel when paired with someone more avoidant than them.
AH! Okay, so that answers that, I guess.
But with someone more anxious, you'd get avoidant...
Yup.
but if you don't normally pair with anxious partners, you may think you're mostly only anxious because that's the place you experience more and are more conscious of. But it's not necessarily because you're AP, it's because you're not choosing more anxious or secure partners. If you were, you might quickly feel avoidant, which would make you shut down and possibly quickly leave the relationship because it would feel like you aren't attracted-- so that avoidant side you have may not even really have registered.
It's registering, but I think this definitely explains it given my behavior with someone who was AP. I found EVERYTHING wrong with him, shut down, screamed at him, etc. I also sorta did this with an SA. It's funny b/c those two always remind me of each other - but they are not really like - maybe a little, more I think it was how I *reacted* to them. I literally shouted at them, which was bewildering. And I ran away and later regretted it.
Since you keep pointing to you do have tendencies towards avoidance when not triggered anxious, it indicates you have issues in both areas but lean opposite of whoever you're paired with (normal for FA, who have a weak sense of consistency identity and are probably most prone to reacting to other people since they lack enough connection to self to hold steady on their own without external stimulus).
Yikes. I'm kind of dealing with this now. I'm working with a therapist who recently told me that I really identify with a survivor/strong identity but that's not all of who I am. I tried to externalize that identity, and I literally feel a blankness. Like I got so lost in that identity, and its been so many years of fighting and trauma and being embattled, that I forgot who I am without that. Phew.
You can think of it this way. Higher anxiety points (on the attachment style scale) mean greater distrust in self and higher fear of abandonment. Higher avoidance points mean greater distrust in others and higher fear of engulfment. FAs, therefore, experience all of those things, and swing all over the place in a disorganized way because they don't trust self or others enough -- so what can you trust??? It's a very, very difficult mindset which is why it's so i
I was going to say, yes, I experience and relate to both, unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Apr 18, 2020 14:12:09 GMT
The times he reached out to do a phone call, I turned him down like 3 times. I wondered about that, but mostly b/c I was in bed already, or didn't feel like it, or it would have meant staying up later than I wanted - or I wasn't "in the right frame of mind" <---- I guess this is not AP behavior?
AP who didn't want to talk would probably line up another time to talk right away to make sure the person wouldn't get mad at their refusal and abandon them. So either, "not tonight but how about tomorrow instead?" Or say "not tonight," then on another day panic that the partner might be upset or mad and apologize profusely and try to reconnect to ease that anxiety of fear of abandonment and rejection.
Ohhhhhhhhh!!!! This clears up SO much!!!!! Yes, I was more like "okay," and then didn't. Or just blew it off. He asked like 3 times and I kept blowing him off. And that's interesting since now HE'S the ONE WHO GHOSTED ME!?!
But this really helps give me a sense of AP! Which I'm clearly not! Wow. Kind of mind-blowing at 48 to finally figure this out!
You're welcome, and hope it helps.
Yes, SO much. THANK YOU!!!! Very grateful to you!!
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Apr 18, 2020 14:20:36 GMT
I think too, that a lot of this comes with experience. When anyone who is not naturally detached (like a DA)
Do you mind if I ask what "naturally detached" "like DA" means? I think I know a former DA partner (I'm guessing this is what he was - also covert narcissist, so probably fits).
falls in love with a emotionally present avoidant in the honeymoon phase, the relationship " looks secure". Then there is usually some kind of brutal discard,
On the part of whom? If I'm FA and the guy I was just talking to is maybe FA (could he have been DA? Don't know). But he did the discard.
followed by intermittent reinforcement.
Yeah, none of that here. (Right now). But I was (probably) an FA, as you are suggesting, who spent almost a year with a AP and while I didn't intentionally intermittently reinforce, it was A LOT of off/on, off/on.
Its not just "AP's" who will give the benefit of the doubt and try to get what they had back. Anyone with a lot of love in their heart, who hasn't been through it before, will become affected by this.
Who hasn't been through what before? I guess you're describing me here - FA with love in my heart (I did feel a connection with this recent guy and got "attached" to him).
Your job is not to fix yourself and blame your previous wounds for what happened. Its to carefully choose someone who won't do this to you. Learn about the signs of avoidance , don't commit too much of your time to people you don't know, and run if they look non-committal.
GOOD ADVICE!!!!
It doesn't matter of you came from a broken background or will never have enough resources and beauty to feel secure. The only thing that matters is learning to pick good people IMO.
Yep! Hopefully that's what I'm doing!
|
|
|
Post by simply on Apr 23, 2020 13:36:40 GMT
Secure style people don't do anything with the gaps except approach them with neutral and open-minded curiosity, ask questions, engage in conversation as you might with anyone, and let the person tell you and show you who they are without you projecting any assumptions either positive or negative. Then, they assess if it's someone they like or want to get to know better or feel they connect with based on who the person is, currently and directly in front of them, while noting if who that person appears to be stays consistent over time. Alexandra, brilliant responses as usual, we are so lucky to have you on this forum. However, I want to ask, if one is very attracted to the person, then how can they approach them with open mind, curiosity and just maintain neutral feelings if they are already so attracted and have romantic feelings to this person? Don't secure people feel attraction...?
|
|
|
Post by simply on Apr 23, 2020 15:37:53 GMT
Your job is not to fix yourself and blame your previous wounds for what happened.Hey serenity, can I know what you mean by "previous wounds" you mean our AP attachment style or? I love your response, it's very insightful and compassionate so I'm wanting to put the pieces together....thx x.
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Apr 23, 2020 21:38:10 GMT
Your job is not to fix yourself and blame your previous wounds for what happened.Hey serenity, can I know what you mean by "previous wounds" you mean our AP attachment style or? I love your response, it's very insightful and compassionate so I'm wanting to put the pieces together....thx x. Hi Simply! Many people who are anxious attached in a relationship tend to fall back to self blame when they are not getting their needs met, which is usually a learned habit from childhood. What follows are behaviours like trying to fix the relationship, excessively please the other person, and when all else fails they try to change themselves in ways that may not be realistic (such as trying to remove deeply entrenched anxiety triggers - which may be caused by imprinted wounds from childhood , combined by intermittent reinforcement and lack of relationship security). Imprinted wounds from childhood may include any kind of abuse or neglect , usually starting in early childhood. The triggers can be managed, understood, and even reduce in time, but its usually a life-long process. Therapists have consistently told me from a young age that its better to form healthy relationships with people who satisfy my needs, than to live in triggered state by choosing neglectful or abusive partners . And i've found that to be extremely good advice.
|
|