|
Post by faithopelove on Oct 30, 2018 22:41:55 GMT
I realize I might understand vulnerability a little bit different from most people. From my perspective, initiating contact and asking for response feels very vulnerable and uncomfortable. It feels like showing others that I need something from them, and I don't want them to think I need anything. It is like revealing myself and giving others the power to reject and hurt me. From what I've read about APs, their belief seems to be "if I just try hard enough, I will get a response". They actively try to get their needs met. My belief is "if I don't try at all, I'll see who care for me and who don't", and my first assumption is that I will be rejected if I try anything, so I don't see any point in trying. I get totally passive. I wait for others to come to me, I never ask them to do it. If they don't, I just conclude they're not interested and give up. I only feel safe with people who chase me and that's basically how all my friendships have developed: someone being persistent enough to not care how many times I involuntarily reject them. At some point I may feel safe enough to start initiating contact sometimes, but I still need to feel they do it more. I always adjust my needs towards the person to their level and even below it. I used to be unaware of doing this until some of my friends said I behaved like I didn't even want to have them around. Maybe it has felt like push-pull to them. It has been the same in dating. I must have been quite rejective to the people I've being seeing. At the same time I may have been wondering how much they care for me, and I haven't realized I'm pushing them away while still hoping they'd come for me. That's good self-insight. AP activity is not truly vulnerable because it's not about clearly expressing needs, seeing if the other person is willing to meet them and accepting what happens, it is about control, about thinking if they say and do the right things the person will love them. Being passive or receptive can be giving up control to others and can in some ways be more vulnerable (although obviously it can feel safer for some). A person being AP thinks they want to be very close with someone, but they've often found that people are reluctant to get as close as they would like, and they blame themselves, so they may also hide their real needs. They may ask for too little in relationships because their main fear is the other person leaving. They may not really even know what they need, other than to not be abandoned and have reassurance. They might sometimes be able to stifle their pleas for reassurance in the hopes of not being abandoned. Sadly, their desire for constant reassurance can drive people away from them, confirming their worldview that they will be abandoned (and people subconsciously want to have their worldview be confirmed). To me, it doesn't seem like a contradiction that someone feeling AP can both act needy and hide or undervalue needs, but I'm not sure if I'm explaining it well. You could look at not expressing needs as still something the person is "doing" to try to get their greater need to not be abandoned met, if that makes sense. There's a thread somewhere about criticisms of attachment theory you might be interested in. You explained the above very well, from an AP perspective. The fear of abandonment drives my behavior, and although I fight against it- it still is very difficult to ignore or stifle.
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Oct 30, 2018 22:48:12 GMT
I've been thinking about this a lot too. I test as FA leaning towards AP, but the rarity and some descriptions of the style have made me question it. I don’t relate much to the push-pull-behaviour, at least not on a conscious level, but many other traits of the style feel very familiar, especially the negative view of self and others and being fearful and indecisive in relationships. Hard to trust anyone ( or myself), hard to get close to people and let them close to me. Very hard to get into relationships (experiencing my first real one in late 20s). Childhood experiences sound familiar, too, and I've had my share of mental problems associated with FA style. I believe my mother is also FA. It needs to be remembered that attachment theory is a theory. There are no truths out there, only lots of contradictory information. Not all sources are reliable and based on research or clinical experience. I don’t really trust the tests either. The questions can be interpreted in so many ways. For example, things like intimacy and being close to someone mean very different things to different people. There also seems to be a lot of confusion between dynamic and style. Is attachment style a style at all, or always a dynamic? Is it something that exists in a person as a result of their childhood attachments or something that develops between two people? Do we only get attached to people who enable us to participate in a certain dynamic and lose interest in them if they don’t? I think there is no point in defining a "style" if it can change from relationship to another. A dynamic changes, a style doesn’t (if there aren’t some major life events or conscious effort to do so). If there is a such a thing as a stable style - and let’s assume there is - I believe it is defined by how much you need intimacy, what kind of partners you feel attracted to and how you generally view yourself, your partners and your relationships. That being said, I’m not that sure about the theory of DAs becoming anxious when meeting someone more DA. Isn’t DA defined by the absence of anxiety? Anxiety comes from idealization of a partner and a negative view of self and it makes you chase. For DAs, the self is enough and a relationship is never a priority. If they feel their partner pulling away, they just don’t care. It’s been said that DAs don’t tend to date each other because of this. I think many of those who fluctuate between AP and DA behaviour are really either AP or FA. Maybe FA is just the “grey area” between AP and DA and they are much more common than 5 %. The usual FA description - craving intimacy and pulling away from it in the same relationship - seems to be rare, but is it really the only way to experience the FA style? Doesn’t the need to push and pull depend on the partner? If you are with another avoidant, your anxious side is more dominant and you feel no need to pull away, but it doesn't mean your style can’t be anxious avoidant (FA). But your anxiety keeps you hooked. This has been the case with me and my DA(/FA?) partner. In this case, many FAs may actually be confused with APs. People often ask what is the difference between FAs and DAs and they get compared to each other, as if the avoidant side was more dominant in FAs and they had more in common with DAs. FAs have anxiety, too, and they may become very dependent, just like APs. I find it confusing that some texts describe APs as being clingy, dramatic, calling you all the time and always asking for reassurance and attention, but some texts say APs tend to hide their needs, be ashamed of them and ask for too little in their relationships because they believe their needs can't be met. This is a clear difference between activity (vulnerability) and passivity (fear of vulnerability) and in my opinion, they can't be in the same attachment style, because the former sees others as available and the latter sees others as unavailable. They are completely different ways of relating. Maybe this is actually the difference between AP and FA? FAs can’t be vulnerable so they deny and hide their needs (avoidant trait), but they don’t feel comfortable that way (anxious trait). I think many APs can handle real intimacy and so they sometimes pair with secures. APs can also be anxious with secures, too, because some secures want less intimacy than them. But for FAs, the intimacy of secures may be too much because secures tend to want more intimacy than them (as shown in the avoidance-anxiety-axis). Push-pull may ensue, or maybe it just ends before it begins (come to think of it, I think I may have pushed and pulled and given mixed signals with secures... until I've ended it or they've given up). Now that you said it, FAs really have nothing in common with secures. They share the avoidance with DAs and anxiety with APs but secures just feel like aliens to FAs. Someone who is available and not anxious, positive with themselves and others – what is that?! I can confirm all my friends are some sort of insecures, and at least two of them are probably also FA. I remember feeling a strange connection to these FA friends immediately when I met them, and they have said the same about me. Sometimes I wonder if my boyfriend is FA, too. He seems mainly DA but sometimes he's just too self-critical, people-pleasing and fragile to really be a DA. The link given by happyidiot in the previous message as well as this text describe well the kind of FA style I'm talking about: the-love-compass.com/2013/09/17/the-fearful-avoidant-attachment-style/Is it the DA doesn’t care when a partner pulls away or it just confirms their negative self-talk and beliefs that they are better off alone? And the inherent lack of trust prevents them from chasing anyone bc “an ex is an ex for a reason?” It almost seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy that the DA ends up alone, since they push everyone away. The same way an AP becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as they act on their clingy, needy behavior for fear of abandonment and the partner leaves them for that same overwhelming, protest behavior.
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Oct 30, 2018 22:53:21 GMT
I think attachment can be dynamic as an adjective, a dynamic as a noun, AND also a general style. A style is just a system or manner of doing something, but it doesn't have to be rigid and can still be affected by external influences. A dynamic is a force that stimulates change in the system or style, such as the dynamic between two particular people. And dynamic as an adjective means changeable. I'm not sure "stable" would be the quite the right word for an attachment style, I think of a style more like a process that tries to maintain or return stability. Homeostasis depends on negative feedback loops, so anything that interferes with the feedback mechanisms can disrupt homeostasis. I agree even a style isn't rigid, and "stable" might be a wrong word. But I believe there is some basic amount of intimacy that feels comfortable for a person (which may be quite stable, stemming from their childhood attachments), and they tend to seek this comfort zone in their relationships by either pushing or pulling. Like you said, "a process that tries to maintain or return stability", but I see that this happens in a dynamic when two people with different styles (basic needs for intimacy) meet. I think we generally think the same way, just use different terms and understand them a bit differently. Yeah, sounds reasonable. It is too black-and-white to say DAs never feel anxious, but I think this is what many texts have been saying and what the attachment style tests imply. I'm also writing from personal experience - knowing DAs who just let the relationship drift away if the other one is more avoidant than them, or not getting interested in the first place. But personal experience is not the truth, and even DAs can be different. It is also possible that all insecure people have the capability to feel anxious, but their "style" is defined by what amount of avoidance from their partners is needed to bring it out. For avoidants, most people are less avoidant than them and they usually don't need to feel anxious, so that it what makes them avoidants. I'm not trying to say I know anything better. I'm just pointing out some inconsistencies and contradictory statements that I've come across when reading about attachment theory, and I'm trying to form a coherent general view of these things. I theorize a lot and always question things, even my own thinking. But of course these things are complex because people are complex. I realize I might understand vulnerability a little bit different from most people. From my perspective, initiating contact and asking for response feels very vulnerable and uncomfortable. It feels like showing others that I need something from them, and I don't want them to think I need anything. It is like revealing myself and giving others the power to reject and hurt me. From what I've read about APs, their belief seems to be "if I just try hard enough, I will get a response". They actively try to get their needs met. My belief is "if I don't try at all, I'll see who care for me and who don't", and my first assumption is that I will be rejected if I try anything, so I don't see any point in trying. I get totally passive. I wait for others to come to me, I never ask them to do it. If they don't, I just conclude they're not interested and give up. I only feel safe with people who chase me and that's basically how all my friendships have developed: someone being persistent enough to not care how many times I involuntarily reject them. At some point I may feel safe enough to start initiating contact sometimes, but I still need to feel they do it more. I always adjust my needs towards the person to their level and even below it. I used to be unaware of doing this until some of my friends said I behaved like I didn't even want to have them around. Maybe it has felt like push-pull to them. It has been the same in dating. I must have been quite rejective to the people I've being seeing. At the same time I may have been wondering how much they care for me, and I haven't realized I'm pushing them away while still hoping they'd come for me. I’m reading how you respond and rationalize and I’m wondering...are you DA? It sounded that way to me...but I didn’t see you mention yourself as either FA or DA in the post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2018 12:59:57 GMT
I’m reading how you respond and rationalize and I’m wondering...are you DA? It sounded that way to me...but I didn’t see you mention yourself as either FA or DA in the post. Wow, a DA? That's actually the style I resemble the least, I think. But I do have avoidance in me so it's understandable that you'd come to that conclusion, especially from reading my posts. I've been very frustrated when trying to find out my attachment style (or if there even is a style). It has been so dynamic throughout my life. I think I've experienced all of them to some degree. That, I think, is just one proof of my main style: FA, disorganized. I try every single pattern from AP to DA to FA to secure to feel good with myself and in my relationships (and stick with none of them). @blacksnow described it well in another thread: I have both the codependent and narcissistic side in me, and they show up in different situations. I remember this split identity already from my childhood and teens. I was mostly avoidant then. I preferred fantasy over real people, and I found other people draining and suffocating. Some life experiences have broken my walls and made me more anxious as an adult. I now identify as anxious-dominant FA, although I still sometimes suspect I'm just AP, and then I remember all my avoidant history, and... I'm really not sure. FA has been the safest guess, and there is a lot of evidence to support it. At least I know I was not AP as a child. Oct 30, 2018 23:08:43 GMT 2 faithopelove said: Oct 30, 2018 19:04:39 GMT 2 blacksnow said: I can see this now, yes. Many people in this thread have explained it well, and it does demonstrate the ambivalence of AP. But I was still thinking... to be AP, is it required to act both ways or at at least another? I remember a post from anne12 where it was said that there are two kinds of APs, those who settle for what they get, ask for too little and feel sad if their needs aren't met, and then there are those who get angry and demanding and resort to protest behavior. So there could be a difference in personality, temperament, other experiences and expectations, and some APs can be a combination of these (and their main motive is always to try to prevent abandonment). But what if anxiety doesn't result in either of these? I'm writing this to see if those who identify as AP can relate to this, or if it is more like "avoidant kind of anxiety". I feel anxiety but I almost never act based on it because if I do, I give my power away, and I'm very much aware of who has the power in the relationship. (Perhaps needless to say, I feel very uncomfortable as the partner who has less power). If my partner doesn't seem to need me, I feel like I need to show I need him even less OR conclude that he doesn't care enough, he's just playing with me and I should give up on him. But I may still be afraid of losing him and second guess my feelings - "maybe I'm being too rash, maybe it's just my anxiety talking". So my anxiety mostly results in me wondering if there is something wrong with my partner and if I should invest in him or not. Or trying to gain more power by adjusting my needs. It's very complicated, but it does feel different from the typical AP anxiety, I think. (Also makes me think if this is how a DA feels with another DA who is more avoidant).
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Oct 31, 2018 14:09:32 GMT
]Is it the DA doesn’t care when a partner pulls away or it just confirms their negative self-talk and beliefs that they are better off alone? And the inherent lack of trust prevents them from chasing anyone bc “an ex is an ex for a reason?” It almost seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy that the DA ends up alone, since they push everyone away. The same way an AP becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as they act on their clingy, needy behavior for fear of abandonment and the partner leaves them for that same overwhelming, protest behavior. That's why most of us are here..... After experiencing something like this and being left wondering "What on Earth has happened here?"
|
|
|
Post by faithopelove on Oct 31, 2018 14:20:55 GMT
Wow, a DA? That's actually the style I resemble the least, I think. But I do have avoidance in me so it's understandable that you'd come to that conclusion, especially from reading my posts. I've been very frustrated when trying to find out my attachment style (or if there even is a style). It has been so dynamic throughout my life. I think I've experienced all of them to some degree. That, I think, is just one proof of my main style: FA, disorganized. I try every single pattern from AP to DA to FA to secure to feel good with myself and in my relationships (and stick with none of them). @blacksnow described it well in another thread: I have both the codependent and narcissistic side in me, and they show up in different situations. I remember this split identity already from my childhood and teens. I was mostly avoidant then. I preferred fantasy over real people, and I found other people draining and suffocating. Some life experiences have broken my walls and made me more anxious as an adult. I now identify as anxious-dominant FA, although I still sometimes suspect I'm just AP, and then I remember all my avoidant history, and... I'm really not sure. FA has been the safest guess, and there is a lot of evidence to support it. At least I know I was not AP as a child. Oct 30, 2018 23:08:43 GMT 2 faithopelove said: Oct 30, 2018 19:04:39 GMT 2 blacksnow said: I can see this now, yes. Many people in this thread have explained it well, and it does demonstrate the ambivalence of AP. But I was still thinking... to be AP, is it required to act both ways or at at least another? I remember a post from anne12 where it was said that there are two kinds of APs, those who settle for what they get, ask for too little and feel sad if their needs aren't met, and then there are those who get angry and demanding and resort to protest behavior. So there could be a difference in personality, temperament, other experiences and expectations, and some APs can be a combination of these (and their main motive is always to try to prevent abandonment). But what if anxiety doesn't result in either of these? I'm writing this to see if those who identify as AP can relate to this, or if it is more like "avoidant kind of anxiety". I feel anxiety but I almost never act based on it because if I do, I give my power away, and I'm very much aware of who has the power in the relationship. (Perhaps needless to say, I feel very uncomfortable as the partner who has less power). If my partner doesn't seem to need me, I feel like I need to show I need him even less OR conclude that he doesn't care enough, he's just playing with me and I should give up on him. But I may still be afraid of losing him and second guess my feelings - "maybe I'm being too rash, maybe it's just my anxiety talking". So my anxiety mostly results in me wondering if there is something wrong with my partner and if I should invest in him or not. Or trying to gain more power by adjusting my needs. It's very complicated, but it does feel different from the typical AP anxiety, I think. (Also makes me think if this is how a DA feels with another DA who is more avoidant). Hey, an AP definitely acts on the anxiety. Both lacking empathy and hypervigilance make sense to me as I relate to being AP...I think it’s my hypervigilance and hyper sensitivity about my partner’s actions and perceived motivation for those actions, which cause me to lack empathy. At that point, my anxiety takes over and hijacks my nervous system, and I can really focus only myself at that point of escalation- calming my extreme anxiety and bringing my internal state brought back down to a calm state is my narrow priority. It’s a feeling of panic that needs to be regulated and it feels like the regulation is dependent upon my partner. That’s when protest behaviors kick in- such as over texting or accusations etc. I have a feeling of deep disconnect with my partner at this point which scares me and my end goal is not winning any argument, but reconnecting. It seems my partners always viewed the protests as criticism and a competition to win an argument- but to me it was always about reconnecting and calming my anxiety. As far as Anne’s post you mentioned- I more readily identify with the sad AP who feels her needs are unmet and doesn’t know how to ask for needs to be met or even trust they will be; however, that feeling can quickly flip to anger and resentment if triggered. So again, I feel both states can be present, although my default mode is to put my partner on a pedestal and make him my world. As I’m typing out these contradictory behaviors and feelings and reactions to such, I can easily see why AP behavior can be viewed as very unstable to a partner. It’s very chaotic. I never want to be this person again. Eye opening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2018 14:28:36 GMT
]Is it the DA doesn’t care when a partner pulls away or it just confirms their negative self-talk and beliefs that they are better off alone? And the inherent lack of trust prevents them from chasing anyone bc “an ex is an ex for a reason?” It almost seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy that the DA ends up alone, since they push everyone away. The same way an AP becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as they act on their clingy, needy behavior for fear of abandonment and the partner leaves them for that same overwhelming, protest behavior. That's why most of us are here..... After experiencing something like this and being left wondering "What on Earth has happened here?" So true. I think the ones that have found this forum are the lucky ones. We are thinking about it and recognizing our patterns. You can't change what you don't see. Even so, with my awareness of my issues, they don't seem to change much. 7 months post break up and I don't have the urge to date. My ex, who is AP, has even though he still hopes we will reconcile. I guess old patterns die hard.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Nov 2, 2018 2:23:11 GMT
I find it confusing that some texts describe APs as being clingy, dramatic, calling you all the time and always asking for reassurance and attention, but some texts say APs tend to hide their needs, be ashamed of them and ask for too little in their relationships because they believe their needs can't be met. This is a clear difference between activity (vulnerability) and passivity (fear of vulnerability) and in my opinion, they can't be in the same attachment style, because the former sees others as available and the latter sees others as unavailable. Good, detailed analysis...I wanted to address the literature you found on AP. It’s yes to both statements above on AP’s. It’s true that APs both seek AND are afraid of having their needs met- I believe this describes much of that ambivalent part of the AP. APs lack the confidence to bring up their needs in a healthy way and do not feel their partners will meet them, so they tend to keep things bottled up and eventually explode in a moment when they lose emotional self-control. That’s when you’ll see the over texting and other protest behaviors. Then they’ll later apologize, ruminate over their rash behavior and seek to regain the distance caused by their protest. At this boiling point, emotional self-control is hijacked and protest behaviors ensue as the only thing that matters to the AP at this frenzied point is lowering their panicked heightened anxiety. They lose sight of all sense- objectivity and their partner’s needs. So, the seemingly contradictory literature you brought up aren’t contradictory at all but exactly on point as far as my experience as an AP. Yes yes yes. When In in AP mode, I hide my needs. It annoys me the forums here on AP use the word clingy because it can feel like the opposite--deep wanting but inability to show it or ask for what one wants and needs. One fan be mentally clingy without it being as reflected in one's behavior, if one worries that showing it will lead to quicker rejection.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Nov 2, 2018 2:31:02 GMT
]Is it the DA doesn’t care when a partner pulls away or it just confirms their negative self-talk and beliefs that they are better off alone? And the inherent lack of trust prevents them from chasing anyone bc “an ex is an ex for a reason?” It almost seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy that the DA ends up alone, since they push everyone away. The same way an AP becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as they act on their clingy, needy behavior for fear of abandonment and the partner leaves them for that same overwhelming, protest behavior. That's why most of us are here..... After experiencing something like this and being left wondering "What on Earth has happened here?" I really think that is the million dollar question.
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Nov 2, 2018 3:41:06 GMT
It's only by being here and seeing how others have acted, that I think we can gain insight into ourselves.
|
|
|
Post by happyidiot on Nov 5, 2018 7:41:28 GMT
Yes yes yes. When In in AP mode, I hide my needs. It annoys me the forums here on AP use the word clingy because it can feel like the opposite--deep wanting but inability to show it or ask for what one wants and needs. One fan be mentally clingy without it being as reflected in one's behavior, if one worries that showing it will lead to quicker rejection. Do you know if that's common to straight-up APs or mainly FAs? I can be feeling really anxious and clingy and hide it completely. But I'm not sure if that's super common with people who identify as just AP?
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Nov 5, 2018 7:45:15 GMT
Yes yes yes. When In in AP mode, I hide my needs. It annoys me the forums here on AP use the word clingy because it can feel like the opposite--deep wanting but inability to show it or ask for what one wants and needs. One fan be mentally clingy without it being as reflected in one's behavior, if one worries that showing it will lead to quicker rejection. Do you know if that's common to straight-up APs or mainly FAs? I can be feeling really anxious and clingy and hide it completely. But I'm not sure if that's super common with people who identify as just AP? As a straight up AP, I would hide it. Either because I knew it was disproportionate to the situation and I'd feel embarrassed and want to be the cool girl, or because I was deprioritizing my own needs and couldn't communicate it.
|
|
|
Post by boomerang on Nov 6, 2018 3:37:12 GMT
Do you know if that's common to straight-up APs or mainly FAs? I can be feeling really anxious and clingy and hide it completely. But I'm not sure if that's super common with people who identify as just AP? As a straight up AP, I would hide it. Either because I knew it was disproportionate to the situation and I'd feel embarrassed and want to be the cool girl, or because I was deprioritizing my own needs and couldn't communicate it. I (AP) totally hide it, too. It's all about rejection for me. It's too risky. If I come forward and get pushed away, I feel that person doesn't value me/want me. Since I believe no one ever does, that is a devastating experience for me to be avoided at all costs. Inside, clingy as hell. In the end, I think that in me, it's fundamentally a fear of honest communication. If someone could say, "I love you but I need a bit more space", that would be fine. But if they don't give me reassurance when stating their needs, I am dishonest in that I cannot say, "I want more of you." I need to feel assured that they want me or more of me for me to ask for more. Since I have never had that experience of feeling sure about that, I do not express my own needs, as stated above. I rather feel that someone will reject me if I ask of them. My recent FA/DA told me early this year that he did not want to feel responsible for my feelings. No way was I going to act clingy with him, I assure you.
|
|
|
Post by boomerang on Nov 6, 2018 4:05:17 GMT
From what I've read about APs, their belief seems to be "if I just try hard enough, I will get a response". They actively try to get their needs met.
The way I tried hard, as AP, in my former relationship with my DA/FA, was trying very, very hard to suppress, not my needs, but outward expression of them, as that would drive him away. That was the only way I could get some of my needs met, if you can follow.
It was exhausting.
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Nov 6, 2018 4:20:58 GMT
From what I've read about APs, their belief seems to be "if I just try hard enough, I will get a response". They actively try to get their needs met.
The way I tried hard, as AP, in my former relationship with my DA/FA, was trying very, very hard to suppress, not my needs, but outward expression of them, as that would drive him away. That was the only way I could get some of my needs met, if you can follow.
It was exhausting.
I think that part of it comes from feeling/being told that our needs were too much/selfish as children...so we don't know what a legitimate need is or how to express it in a way that is self honoring. Needs feel so risky....so it is better to just stuff them down and focus on the other person.
|
|