|
|
Post by brokenbiscuit on Jul 24, 2018 3:37:18 GMT
If you are trying to understand Fa's then Attached is no good as for reasons unknown it decides to completely ignore this particular attachment type. Instead I found the writers sort of mixed it in quietly with DAs which is not helpful to anyone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2018 8:17:59 GMT
If you are trying to understand Fa's then Attached is no good as for reasons unknown it decides to completely ignore this particular attachment type. Instead I found the writers sort of mixed it in quietly with DAs which is not helpful to anyone. broken biscuit - That's an interesting perspective. I just bought Attached yesterday and the tests show that I am more Secure than I had thought - still with AP / FA parts. I interpreted the test through FA rather than DA eyes. |
|
jdb
New Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by jdb on Aug 19, 2018 2:01:06 GMT
I agree about the book "Attached" not being the right guide for FA. I just remember a line in the beginning that if you're Anxious-Avoidant (their term for it), then you should take heed to both summaries which is confusing and doesn't lend too much insight and may steer you in the wrong direction. When I first tried to identify my ex, it showed her as both (50% avoidant, and 50% anxious) so I focused on the Avoidant aspects to understand. Obviously, there were quite a few discrepancies as FA and DA are entirely different animals.
|
|
