|
Post by krolle on Jul 3, 2021 1:54:01 GMT
Do you see intellectuallization as a negative thing? I must admit I'm surprised it is you who would bring up the topic. I'm not sure how I feel about it. I don't see intellectualization as a negative thing, it's not a criticism. I'm suggesting that it MIGHT be a way to defend oneself against feeling the emotions associated with a situation. It can be a defense and one I am familiar with, as prior to accessing my emotional life to the extent that I have, I tended to intellectualize a lot without even realizing that it was a coping mechanism. Did you read the article I posted with defenses? An intellectual conversation is not a bad thing, but can be a distraction from accessing and processing emotions and dealing with underlying concerns that perpetuate unhealthy patterns. I only suggest it without saying that I know for a fact that is going on- that assessment can be had individually if relevant or desired. The OP posted something about being sad, and discovering painful traits in herself, and then the conversation switched to talking about generalizations and the intellectual analysis of attachment and PD. So I just noticed a shift from internal emotional states to intellectual analysis. I'm not suggesting that anyone must process thwre emotions here, I'm just familiar with this as a defense against vulnerability, i. myself. So- again not a criticism, just an observation which may or may not be helpful. We insecure types use all kind of deflection to avoid touching pain. Humor is one, intellectualization is another, and others are listed in the article. These are things that Ive addressed personally on my path toward becoming emotionally available to myself and others. I would always welcome criticism from you, or anyone else if it were back up by logic and evidence. My saying I was surprised by the fact it was you that brought it up was really more of an indirect attempt at getting you to to discuss a topic I assumed you might have personal experience with. If I were to describe your posts, 'intellectual' would likely be one of the top adjectives. And my saying "I'm not sure" was not in reference to you being perceived as possibly critical. But that I MAY be critical of Intellectualization as something to be legitimately seen as negative. Im not sure yet. For a start Intellectualization is Freudian psychology if I'm correct, which makes me feel quiet mistrusting of it to begin with. And secondly, it's a little ego defence on my part. I value intellectualism above lots of things. It's part of who I am and linked to most of what I respect. Emotions are to be distrusted, not ignored for sure, but not taken as truth about pretty much anything. Most of the 'madness' and stress I have encountered in my life were in interaction with individuals who have uncontrollable emotions, Who's actions are based on impulse, reactivity and intuition. And ironically those are the types of women I often get romantically involved with. Go figure, probably a pattern there. The OP started by discussing feelings she had. Then the discussion turned intellectual as you said. My argument is that's actually a positive thing, rather than a dysfunctional defence mechanism as posited in the article you referenced. Which I did very much enjoy reading. It's taking something which is in the primitive parts of our brain and bringing it into awareness of the PFC. Which I see as positive. I think you get the idea of the type of person I am, reserved, logical, stoic, self reliant, mistrusting (most of the time anyway). And can likely easily see why my ego would need to defend in such a discussion about emotion. I seem very DA in those senses, which I imagine you can relate to. And very...Male too I guess. Criticize my train of thought, I invite it from you, or anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by krolle on Jul 3, 2021 2:09:47 GMT
I caught myself using humor to deflect from feelings of hurt and disappointment concerning an interaction that I had with my boyfriend last night. I had a feeling of seizing right under my sternum about the interaction, and tried and tried to shove it down. Then this morning I made a joke about it. But, I caught myself, and approached my boyfriend gently and directly to address the issue in a straightforward, emotionally honest way. It's such growth. I noted my use of humor and mentioned that I was concerned that the negative feelings might escalate, and I wanted to see if we could be vulnerable with one another to restore the sweetness that generally exists between us, and to clear up any misunderstanding between us. He recognized why I felt hurt, and apologized, asking what he could do to help me feel better. I told him the conversation was enough, and thanked him. He hugged me a long time and I felt a lot better. This is a big advancement in our communication, on both sides. I might have avoided the emotional side of it with various defenses, until I cracked. He might have reacted defensively and been insecurity triggered, even if I would have tried to bring it up in such a way to try to restore goodness between us. Those were common reactions between us. So- awareness of defenses on both sides really paved the way toward a simple, secure way to address emotional pain. It's something I'm working on. You posted this as I was writing my response. So apologies if didn't acknowledge anything you said in here. I will reflect on it.
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Jul 3, 2021 8:11:33 GMT
These are some of the quality interactions that makes this forum so very worthwhile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2021 13:07:45 GMT
krolle, the problem as I see it is that you've been involved with personality disordered women, and not healthy women. Emotions are messy sometimes, and certainly intellect can be used to help resolve them, if the intellect is applied to the emotion and actually acknowledges it and works with it. I don't believe the intellect can be helpful in the resolution of emotions if it is used to bypass them. Dealing with the physiological impulses connected to emotion is very helpful as well, but again, by acknowledging those impulses and working with them, directly. So, a run to dispel the energy of a fight is somewhat useful physiologically, and therefore it will improve the quality of the mind because of the way that physiology and the mind are so chemically connected. But if you actively pay attention to the feeling in your body, that accompanies emotion, you can learn what message it is giving you, and it is usually a message of emotion. The two, intellect and emotion, are all intertwined of course. I know you are familiar with the physical sensation of emotion/reaction because you've mentioned feelings in your stomach. Our bodies are translators I would say, of emotional messaging we have received. They relay messages such as "This situation feels dangerous. I feel angry! or I feel happy! Or, I am compelled to help!" It's kind of like the emotion is the energy, and the mind can decide what to do with it IF it understands the message. Some may see it another way- it is all very visceral and some identify feelings and interact with them naturally from the word Go. Many of us don't identify the feelings and interact with them naturally, until we develop that... but rest assured, on some level they drive us and we Want them. Why else do irrational things? That's the negative side not of having emotions, but of not identifying them and interacting with them in a conscious way. Perhaps you've been involved with over-emotional reactive women because you're not in touch with your own emotion, and react primitively to the internal drives instead of in a conscious way that really listens to your own emotions. Other people's emotions can take the steering wheel of our lives if we don't allow our own emotions to have a say. And, if you don't get a handle on emotions and I mean actually handle, and touch them, they will handle you. I know you are very confused about a lot of things, having been bandied about by others, and that's why I believe that turning toward all the emotion inside yourself, instead of away, can be very helpful for you. You have the care and intelligence to do a better job with yourself emotionally than others have. It seems others have taken it upon themselves to identify and interpret your emotions in terrible ways- saying that your reluctance to have sex in conflict is selfish, cruel. And then they attempted to influence your choices and actions around that. Also, you were unsure and asked other people about their interpretations- but it sounds like you got some really unhelpful interpretations. You can, and are obliged to identify your own emotions in trying situations, and apply your intelligence. You can stand up for yourself KNOWING what your feelings and motivations are, and that those feelings are very good messenger... then you can make a solid, intelligent choice driven by feelings to do exactly what you need to do in order to take care of yourself. Do that daily and you will steer yourself out of troubled relationships much more easily. And, that kind of emotional access can steer you into much more healthy, productive, rewarding relationships. It's all very complex and I'm not sure that I've adequately expressed myself here. We can be attracted to that which we have suppressed in ourselves. Initially there must have been an emotionality in your partners that was appealing, which didn't seem destructive. People have good and bad, even personality disordered people. So you may have enjoyed your opposite the way I enjoy mine, in my boyfriend. He's so affectionate with me, warm and emotional. I respond well to that although I didn't initially offer it to him, as I'm avoidant and he's not. I won't even say I'm avoidant, I'll say, I've been repressed in a lot of ways and I'm correcting that. Our minds are plastic. They can be molded, changed, developed. We cannot separate our mind from emotion and live a human life. I have seen for myself that integrating emotion in a healthy way is the only way to have true understanding, of myself, others, and actually, the world. Natural beauty evokes emotion in me, that is not separate from the beauty I see in relationships. People are a natural wonder. Some seem like a natural disaster. Joke. (Here's where the rational mind can help- what do you do after a natural disaster? You assess, rebuild, and learn how to prepare for the natural disaster. And you take care of your emotions along the way, because there are losses, there is grief and fear and all kinds of emotions in disaster. You get my point. ) Anyway, I'm trailing off in an effort to express my mind on this- ha. But if you could see my face you'd see I'm smiling and warmly asking you to relate to me with your emotions, too... because it's good. š
|
|
|
Post by krolle on Jul 3, 2021 14:44:15 GMT
I....will need.... time... to process those last 2 messages of yours Introvert.
You'v expressed yourself and your ideas in a very impressive manner. And my usual cynicism or denial have no counter for it.....
I don't really know what to do with that. The integration of emotion and intellect is inspirational, if not a hard concept for me to accept.
Goddamit woman! stop being so insightful, your ruining my dysfunctional defence mechanisms lol. š
I was smiling along with you while reading them fwiw.
Hoping the OP is still learning from this thread? we can be quiet prolific writers. Though the discussion of emotion, shame and Intellectualization is relevant to her posts.
I'll say that's a compliment mrob! š I had hoped other people were enjoyed the debates.
|
|
|
Post by krolle on Jul 3, 2021 15:03:03 GMT
No worries! And on the above- I do tend toward intellectual conversations, but when it comes to taking care of the relationship piece that won't do, as we are emotional creatures and logic doesn't take care of it all. For example. Logically, we know that a parent's actions of abuse or neglect are not a child's fault. A child cannot intellectualize that, because of the inborn need for attachment and security: and love. Shame results on the child, and all sorts of negative emotions, if the needs for love and security are not met. Research shows that a child's well being is dependent on not logical care, being treated as an intellectual creature, but upon love, nurture. physical contact. We are not merely intellects. Our physiology continually reacts in ways connected to emotion. [/quote] I have no counter argument against this after what I wrote in your progress thread. You speak truth.
|
|
|
Post by krolle on Jul 3, 2021 15:07:13 GMT
^ Me and the quote feature have an ....insecure relationship. š¤
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jul 3, 2021 16:04:45 GMT
I understand where you're coming from krolle . CPTSD lacks the stigma that surrounds BPD, and people with stress disorders are often given more leeway for their behaviors. But I'll just say... even without having BPD, I have acted abusively in the past (and even in the present) and have hurt people, due to projecting my own issues onto them and due to clouded perceptions. It kinda goes back to the idea that dullboat kept reiterating about avoidants being abusive. I don't think any of us are so innocent. When I really look at it that way, it makes me empathize with 'assholes' more (really, people with an overactive fight response... narcissists have that btw, and I imagine borderlines as well). I think one can be a victim and abusive at the same time. There's no clear cut categories in many cases, unfortunately. As far as taking accountability goes, yeah I generally agree. None of this changes the fact that they are the ones doing harm and therefore they are the ones responsible for their actions. I don't think most of us here would claim innocence. The idea of innocence and guilt are not really very often productive anyway because it's all a matter of opinion. You can empathize with why someone is an asshole but disagree that their behaviour is productive/practical/effective. And to paraphrase you, I believe they are responsible for their actions, not because they are doing harm, but because they control them. I know I'v certainly hurt people before. And from what I understand, in most insecure/unhealthy/codependent relationships both partners are usually 'abusive' toward one another. Though I'm starting to really dislike the word abuse. It's thrown round so much lately it's starting to lose all meaning. It seems anybody who has been hurt in a relationship is convinced they are the victim of abuse. Again it's that desire to play the victim which is so prevalent in society these days. And so dysfunctional because it's ultimately a desire to avoid responsibility. I reiterate, not because the CAUSE is their fault, but because it devoids them of the responsibility to act productively to improve the situation. I also agree with what tnr9 said. Anxious types can be just as 'abusive' as avoidant types, just in a different way. For example an AP with severe attachment wounds can be prone to stalking type behaviours, extreme jealousy, slander campaigns etc. The likelihood of 'abusive' behaviours is dictated by the number and severity of their attachment traumas, and lack of healthy coping mechanisms, not by their attachment style. With regards to your own mental processes blacksnow, a sense I get from some of your posts is a view that you are somehow bad, or broken. And ashamed of it. I'm not an expert. It's just my perception. why do I think that... I struggle with the same feelings. I agree with disliking the word abuse being used to describe general avoidant behaviorā¦.in none of my relationships did I feel abusedā¦.I did feel mislead for a while, but I have to own that on my side of the fence I wanted so desperately for things to workout with B that I never asked about his doubts with any true sincerity behind it. If we are all adultsā¦surelywe can take responsibility for our side of the fence and recognize that the other person is responsible for his or herās. I donāt know where this all or nothingā¦.one person is completely wrong and one person is the victim came from. Life is rarely that dry cut unless it is regarding an adult/child situationā¦.where I would agree that the adult is fully responsible. Otherwise, adults need to step up and take responsibility for their own role in prolonging a bad situationā¦.otherwise nothing changes.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Jul 3, 2021 16:53:44 GMT
I agree, too. I think I did suffer some emotional abuse from some avoidant exes, but it's back to I also allowed that treatment and it was out of mutual ignorance and limitations not maliciousness. It still left me needing to deal with the pain and consequences, but as an adult, you make the decision to pick yourself up (which may require being determined to learn the tools and capacity to do so from scratch) or not. Seeing it as a power struggle dynamic (instead of us acting as independent agents who come together) was a toxic mindset that led to me continuing to wallow until I decided to stop seeing it that way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2021 19:30:42 GMT
FWIW, the material I have read on the subject of pathologies connects avoidant attachment with grandiose narcissism at its end of spectrum worst, and anxious preoccupied attachment with covert narcissism at its worst. In the middle are many shades of grey and other factors including environmental, situational, individual personality and couple dynamics to name a few. The generalizations that have been flying around aren't very helpful, and it must always be remembered that instances are different than patterns, pathologies do not automatically accompany attachment style variations, and what matters most is taking personal responsibility for one's own dynamic including a victim or perpetrator dynamic.
And labels only go so far in any case. They seem to be a go-to as a defense, as well. In the way of categorizing and generalizing and possibly avoiding the real issues of "Where do I go from here with what is within my realm of control.... ME?"
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Jul 3, 2021 20:23:24 GMT
But until youāre aware, youāre not aware! I acted in patterns for 2 decades, knew it was a pattern but had absolutely no idea what was going on. I knew I couldnāt nlame other people as I was the common denominator, but even with therapy, thatās as far as I got! So, itās all very well to say ācontrol yourselfā, but when one is acting on their limbic system without awareness, itās very difficult to make a healthy judgment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2021 0:06:42 GMT
But until youāre aware, youāre not aware! I acted in patterns for 2 decades, knew it was a pattern but had absolutely no idea what was going on. I knew I couldnāt nlame other people as I was the common denominator, but even with therapy, thatās as far as I got! So, itās all very well to say ācontrol yourselfā, but when one is acting on their limbic system without awareness, itās very difficult to make a healthy judgment. No I mean, with awareness... there is little that can be done if you aren't aware.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2021 4:34:19 GMT
I don't think most of us here would claim innocence. The idea of innocence and guilt are not really very often productive anyway because it's all a matter of opinion. You can empathize with why someone is an asshole but disagree that their behaviour is productive/practical/effective. And to paraphrase you, I believe they are responsible for their actions, not because they are doing harm, but because they control them. I know I'v certainly hurt people before. And from what I understand, in most insecure/unhealthy/codependent relationships both partners are usually 'abusive' toward one another. Though I'm starting to really dislike the word abuse. It's thrown round so much lately it's starting to lose all meaning. It seems anybody who has been hurt in a relationship is convinced they are the victim of abuse. Again it's that desire to play the victim which is so prevalent in society these days. And so dysfunctional because it's ultimately a desire to avoid responsibility. I reiterate, not because the CAUSE is their fault, but because it devoids them of the responsibility to act productively to improve the situation. I also agree with what tnr9 said. Anxious types can be just as 'abusive' as avoidant types, just in a different way. For example an AP with severe attachment wounds can be prone to stalking type behaviours, extreme jealousy, slander campaigns etc. The likelihood of 'abusive' behaviours is dictated by the number and severity of their attachment traumas, and lack of healthy coping mechanisms, not by their attachment style. With regards to your own mental processes blacksnow, a sense I get from some of your posts is a view that you are somehow bad, or broken. And ashamed of it. I'm not an expert. It's just my perception. why do I think that... I struggle with the same feelings. I agree with disliking the word abuse being used to describe general avoidant behaviorā¦.in none of my relationships did I feel abusedā¦.I did feel mislead for a while, but I have to own that on my side of the fence I wanted so desperately for things to workout with B that I never asked about his doubts with any true sincerity behind it. If we are all adultsā¦surelywe can take responsibility for our side of the fence and recognize that the other person is responsible for his or herās. I donāt know where this all or nothingā¦.one person is completely wrong and one person is the victim came from. Life is rarely that dry cut unless it is regarding an adult/child situationā¦.where I would agree that the adult is fully responsible. Otherwise, adults need to step up and take responsibility for their own role in prolonging a bad situationā¦.otherwise nothing changes. Amen!! Well said.
|
|
|
Post by blacksnow2 on Jul 22, 2021 19:06:58 GMT
Wow this blew up while I was away. Let's see... blacksnow2 you have so much insight into yourself - can I ask when did this happen? was it an event, a slow realization, etc? sorry if you already shared somewhere and I missed it. Likely a result of inborn characteristics + the fact that I've been blamed for so many things that I internalize a lot more than I should. (?) We are all adults here. There must be a line drawn where even if people are not self-aware, they are responsible for their abusive behaviours. Unless avoidants declare themselves insane, there's no way "lack of self-awareness" will wash in court. However I would love it that all avoidants declare themselves clinically insane because then they will be forced to seek professional help or locked away from the public, rather than going around wrecking people's lives in terms of wasting people's time on earth. I know I sound very harsh but avoidants is like a curse and it will be great to break this generational curse. If I'm a therapist, psychologist or psychiatrist, I'd be glad there's avoidants around because that ensures a constant supply of clients. I truly think you need help. I will disagree blacksnowā¦.because even anxious leaning insecure behavior can be abusiveā¦.it just shows up in a different way. I believe anxious people are also avoidant past their surface-level anxiety. Aka "emotionally unavailable" and not in tune with their real self. They focus on other people to avoid facing themselves. If that's not avoidant, then what is it? I understand where you're coming from krolle . CPTSD lacks the stigma that surrounds BPD, and people with stress disorders are often given more leeway for their behaviors. But I'll just say... even without having BPD, I have acted abusively in the past (and even in the present) and have hurt people, due to projecting my own issues onto them and due to clouded perceptions. It kinda goes back to the idea that dullboat kept reiterating about avoidants being abusive. I don't think any of us are so innocent. When I really look at it that way, it makes me empathize with 'assholes' more (really, people with an overactive fight response... narcissists have that btw, and I imagine borderlines as well). I think one can be a victim and abusive at the same time. There's no clear cut categories in many cases, unfortunately. As far as taking accountability goes, yeah I generally agree. None of this changes the fact that they are the ones doing harm and therefore they are the ones responsible for their actions. I don't think most of us here would claim innocence. The idea of innocence and guilt are not really very often productive anyway because it's all a matter of opinion. You can empathize with why someone is an asshole but disagree that their behaviour is productive/practical/effective. And to paraphrase you, I believe they are responsible for their actions, not because they are doing harm, but because they control them. I know I'v certainly hurt people before. And from what I understand, in most insecure/unhealthy/codependent relationships both partners are usually 'abusive' toward one another. Though I'm starting to really dislike the word abuse. It's thrown round so much lately it's starting to lose all meaning. It seems anybody who has been hurt in a relationship is convinced they are the victim of abuse. Again it's that desire to play the victim which is so prevalent in society these days. And so dysfunctional because it's ultimately a desire to avoid responsibility. I reiterate, not because the CAUSE is their fault, but because it devoids them of the responsibility to act productively to improve the situation. I also agree with what tnr9 said. Anxious types can be just as 'abusive' as avoidant types, just in a different way. For example an AP with severe attachment wounds can be prone to stalking type behaviours, extreme jealousy, slander campaigns etc. The likelihood of 'abusive' behaviours is dictated by the number and severity of their attachment traumas, and lack of healthy coping mechanisms, not by their attachment style. With regards to your own mental processes blacksnow, a sense I get from some of your posts is a view that you are somehow bad, or broken. And ashamed of it. I'm not an expert. It's just my perception. why do I think that... I struggle with the same feelings.You're not wrong about the bolded part. I have a tendency to gaslight myself and take responsibility for things that aren't really my fault or mistakes. I'm still learning to separate myself from other people's emotions and behavior. It's probably the hardest thing for FA's especially.
As far as people "controlling" their behavior, I suppose that's the gray area I'm talking about, and not in a way to excuse people, but because it's hard to put a number on what is subconscious versus what is conscious... and our actions are pretty much always a result of both of those things together. And I think there is a difference between knowing what you're doing (doing things purposely) and being self-aware (requires introspective capacities).
I agree that hurting others =/= necessarily abusive. As with a lot of things, I see it as a spectrum, with abuse being a pattern rather than isolated incidents where we inevitably hurt others... but really, having grown up in a very dysfunctional family and adapted their way of interacting with one another to avoid being punished for my NORMAL reactions and way of relating, it's hard to claim I've only simply 'hurt' others. I mean, I'm STILL undoing these dysfunctional patterns. Either way, what I'm saying comes from wanting to know the truth behind how human behavior works (I'm going to get a PhD in Neuroscience), rather than using this reasoning to excuse people.
Do you see intellectuallization as a negative thing? I must admit I'm surprised it is you who would bring up the topic. I'm not sure how I feel about it. I don't see intellectualization as a negative thing, it's not a criticism. I'm suggesting that it MIGHT be a way to defend oneself against feeling the emotions associated with a situation. It can be a defense and one I am familiar with, as prior to accessing my emotional life to the extent that I have, I tended to intellectualize a lot without even realizing that it was a coping mechanism. Did you read the article I posted with defenses? An intellectual conversation is not a bad thing, but can be a distraction from accessing and processing emotions and dealing with underlying concerns that perpetuate unhealthy patterns. I only suggest it without saying that I know for a fact that is going on- that assessment can be had individually if relevant or desired. The OP posted something about being sad, and discovering painful traits in herself, and then the conversation switched to talking about generalizations and the intellectual analysis of attachment and PD. So I just noticed a shift from internal emotional states to intellectual analysis. I'm not suggesting that anyone must process thwre emotions here, I'm just familiar with this as a defense against vulnerability, i. myself. So- again not a criticism, just an observation which may or may not be helpful. We insecure types use all kind of deflection to avoid touching pain. Humor is one, intellectualization is another, and others are listed in the article. These are things that Ive addressed personally on my path toward becoming emotionally available to myself and others. Are emotions and intellect completely separate? Can you feel things but also communicate them through "intellectualization"? I would say yes. Thinking and feeling are in a feedback loop with each other (limbic system and frontal lobe are connected, or part of the same system). I don't disagree with what you're saying, you're pretty spot on. I just think there's more to it.
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jul 22, 2021 21:17:30 GMT
Wow this blew up while I was away. Let's see... blacksnow2 you have so much insight into yourself - can I ask when did this happen? was it an event, a slow realization, etc? sorry if you already shared somewhere and I missed it. Likely a result of inborn characteristics + the fact that I've been blamed for so many things that I internalize a lot more than I should. (?) We are all adults here. There must be a line drawn where even if people are not self-aware, they are responsible for their abusive behaviours. Unless avoidants declare themselves insane, there's no way "lack of self-awareness" will wash in court. However I would love it that all avoidants declare themselves clinically insane because then they will be forced to seek professional help or locked away from the public, rather than going around wrecking people's lives in terms of wasting people's time on earth. I know I sound very harsh but avoidants is like a curse and it will be great to break this generational curse. If I'm a therapist, psychologist or psychiatrist, I'd be glad there's avoidants around because that ensures a constant supply of clients. I truly think you need help. I will disagree blacksnowā¦.because even anxious leaning insecure behavior can be abusiveā¦.it just shows up in a different way. I believe anxious people are also avoidant past their surface-level anxiety. Aka "emotionally unavailable" and not in tune with their real self. They focus on other people to avoid facing themselves. If that's not avoidant, then what is it? Soā¦you are basically saying the same thingā¦.āallā insecurely attached individuals are capableā¦not just those with āavoidantā in the label. That was my entire point. Every insecurely attached individual āavoidsāā¦..whether it is through drugs, alcohol, shopping, focus on the other, focus on work, focus on hobbiesā¦..insecurity and addiction/avoidance go hand in hand.
|
|