|
Post by alexandra on Dec 12, 2019 18:58:08 GMT
Whoa. I really need to think about this. Is that really a red flag? I have always valued a man appreciating my mind over my appearance. of course i value a man appreciating a mind over my appearance (but I do want to be told I'm pretty and attractive lol). it's a red flag in so far as if that's the key thing that attracts them as a novelty factor that they get tired of because it no longer amuses them - because it entertains them and not because they truly respect you for it, is compatible with it and want to keep it in their lives. It's a very fine line there that I've started noticing. I think the red flag is they're into you for what you can do for them (providing novelty / entertainment) rather than just seeing you for who you actually are and liking / accepting whoever that is. From that perspective, yes, bohemianraspberry, it is like insecure people feeling like "secure" is boring as from the perspective I'm giving it's arguably a symptom of insecure attachment as well. I've also had a problem with guys who start with, I like the way you think. There's idealization in that when they don't yet actually know you. And, as much as I try to make a distinction when things are human things (like attachment, people in general will sometimes negatively say behaviors are gender-based, but they're really attachment issues that can happen to either gender), I believe this is partially a gender issue that has been taught by culture that can happen outside of attachment insecurity, too. There are actually research studies that many men say they want smart women, but when their actions are tracked they don't actually want women who are "too" smart because it makes them feel threatened. Edit: link to 2015 study - journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167215599749
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 22:55:20 GMT
yes i think it's parallel to what @bohemianraspberry said. the red flag is when they're into your brains because it provides them entertainment. when i date smart men, they are entertained because they now get challenged in ways they don't - i'm not saying i'm smarter than them, just different. And they value it more for novelty than just really valuing me and my perspectives. the latter is also true arguably, but the former (novelty) is somewhat stronger and the key ingredient to attraction. like what alexandra said, there's idealization in that. also, there's some fantasy going on - they imagine that being together means that it'll always be entertaining conversations and being stimulated, but reality is when we argue, I can hold my own very well and it isn't that great for them afterall. that is when the idealization ends, and they think i'm just combative. the truth is that i'm just as logical as they are (which they did not perceive as so and as a threat because they see first the difference in ways of thinking), and that logic does not always work in their favor. i speak only from my own experience, so i say men because i've never dated women. my sense is that they want smart women on their side and for their own use, but they don't like it when the smarts can be turned against them, and quite easily so. the one thing that did happen with my ex is that we had very low trust of each other. he knows im smart so he tries to hide things from me and avoid giving me information because at some point, he thinks i'll use it against him. i know he's smart and can protect himself way better than i can myself (he's older and much successful in business), and that always worries me that i'm being taken advantage of. there's an underlying distrust there already, although the intelligence is what attracted us to each other. precisely because of idealization without a deep understanding and acceptance of who we are as people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:17:50 GMT
"I like the way you think" = unavailable, let's play thinking games, also known as mind games. It's a mental attraction, for sparring.
That's how I see it. And I've actually only heard that from men I was indeed sparring with. Sparring because I already knew it was going nowhere due to something I picked up on (overt sexuality, or arrogance, or too much interest too fast). And by now I'm just making an exit. That actually seems to hook them (not my intention at all!) and then I just have to be candidly done. It's just a process of feeling someone out. I actually detest dating and so I wouldn't blame it all (the unavailable mess) on the guy. But I can tell you, if he quickly says he likes the way I think, he likes that I'm unavailable, he wants to have a game, because try as I might, in dating, I've been pretty much unavailable. And it's got to be obvious.
Available men really seem to be looking at things other than intellect, for a serious long term partner. Not that brains aren't sexy. But kindness, openness, good boundaries, warmth, a sense of humor, and humility all are qualities that it seems like healthy, available men look for for a foundation. Those things PLUS intellect will be attractive to a cerebral type- but surely she must have the other qualities of a good partner, first.
That's just how I see it but I'm certainly not an expert, nor am I very experienced. I've only really done unavailable until recently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:23:02 GMT
"I like the way you think" = unavailable, let's play thinking games, also known as mind games. It's a mental attraction, for sparring. That's how I see it. And I've actually only heard that from men I was indeed sparring with. Sparring because I already knew it was going nowhere due to something I picked up on (overt sexuality, or arrogance, or too much interest too fast). And by now I'm just making an exit. That actually seems to hook them (not my intention at all!) and then I just have to be candidly done. It's just a process of feeling someone out. I actually detest dating and so I wouldn't blame it all (the unavailable mess) on the guy. But I can tell you, if he quickly says he likes the way I think, he likes that I'm unavailable, he wants to have a game, because try as I might, in dating, I've been pretty much unavailable. And it's got to be obvious. Available men really seem to be looking at things other than intellect, for a serious long term partner. Not that brains aren't sexy. But kindness, openness, good boundaries, warmth, a sense of humor, and humility all are qualities that it seems like healthy, available men look for for a foundation. Those things PLUS intellect will be attractive to a cerebral type- but surely she must have the other qualities of a good partner, first. That's just how I see it but I'm certainly not an expert, nor am I very experienced. I've only really done unavailable until recently. i agree with alot that you said here. i think it's exactly that - they like the mental sparring because they think it's interesting and fun for them. I'm abit confused at what you just said - are you saying that you mentally spar/mind games because you've decided it's not going anywhere? when you said mind games, do you mean things like how long do you take to reply, how to respond to requests for commitment etc etc? My version of sparring is simply discussion around perspectives and ideas. i do it for a living, it's part of who i am (I'm an academic), so for me it's "normal" to look at a situation and analyze it from various angles. it's not mind games to me, it's just...talking about work and life and approaches to things.
|
|
|
Post by mrob on Dec 12, 2019 23:28:19 GMT
I’ve found this one of the most confronting threads here.
Surely there is some leeway in the getting to know you process? I don’t do stupid women. They’re frustrating, and they’re not interested in me, anyway. I love different perspectives, it is fascinating. My constant bear is that they’ll get bored with me. What happens when they find out I’m just a conservative bloke who likes a quiet life. I don’t party, don’t even go on scary rides at the amusement park! And I don’t know the classics, so they generally run rings around me. Inadequate, perhaps, but that’s something I’ve had to accept.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:33:40 GMT
@shiningstar no, I actually detest mind games. I'm saying that if I am sparring I am in a quick process of evaluating and releasing. He's the one that wants to play games, I've seen it enough to know. I'd also say that if a guy says to me "I like how you think" he thinks I've aligned with him somehow.
If I sense that something is off, I will engage to see where he takes it, spar to feel it out, and then make my decision and communicate that. I do not enjoy trailing things on, and playing games with not texting or whatever. I just get done and make that clear.
I don't take a long time with a person if I'm not digging it. That's part of the issue with my avoidance because I don't give anyone a chance. The men who have been attracted to that are also very unavailable. I would say, that any man that has been attracted to me is as unavailable as I am.
This softboi type, has never engaged me, I am not the one for him for sure. But the intellectual, smart guy into mental games.... Ive seen more than my share of that aside from this weird softboi type.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 12, 2019 23:35:39 GMT
"I like the way you think" = unavailable, let's play thinking games, also known as mind games. It's a mental attraction, for sparring. I don't think this is always true and always a red flag. But I think if an unavailable guy says it, then it does come with an expectation you're going to perform, which it's possible to pick up on as it's controlling. That may be sparring or mind games, or trying to control the interactions. An example I have is I went a on a couple dates with a guy who actually tests secure, but I didn't really think he was. I tried to lighten the conversation on the second date because he was getting us on such intense topics that it felt like his boundaries were wonky with a stranger (which is why I doubted the secure, plus what he over shared about his background). Anyway, his response to my lightening things up (by which I mean talking about common interests, not superficial small talk) was to flat out tell me he only wanted to talk about DEEP topics and brought something deep up we'd actually already even discussed. So, this was, I like this type of intellectual conversation with you and that's what I want -- it doesn't really matter to me what you want. That's different than other guys who appreciated intelligence without expectation of who I was. The insecure guys I dated for a while who were in it for intellectual variety actually all have attempted to stay friends with me and still value it, but it's clear to me now that I know this stuff that they're unavailable.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:38:25 GMT
I’ve found this one of the most confronting threads here. Surely there is some leeway in the getting to know you process? I don’t do stupid women. They’re frustrating, and they’re not interested in me, anyway. I love different perspectives, it is fascinating. My constant bear is that they’ll get bored with me. What happens when they find out I’m just a conservative bloke who likes a quiet life. I don’t party, don’t even go on scary rides at the amusement park! And I don’t know the classics, so they generally run rings around me. Inadequate, perhaps, but that’s something I’ve had to accept. I don't understand, can you let me know if you are responding to something I have said, specifically? My issue as an avoidant, as Ive said, is that I don't give things a chance but I'm also pretty sure from my experiences , looking back, that the men attracted to me were gamey and looking for a challenge. I also like a quiet life tho, not much intensity and the long deep intellectual conversations kill me. I like to just enjoy simple things and don't like to talk much about ideas. I like experiences. Side by side, where the experience is the main attraction and we just share it and be happy. Conversation leaves me tired.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 12, 2019 23:39:02 GMT
I’ve found this one of the most confronting threads here. Surely there is some leeway in the getting to know you process? I don’t do stupid women. They’re frustrating, and they’re not interested in me, anyway. I love different perspectives, it is fascinating. My constant bear is that they’ll get bored with me. What happens when they find out I’m just a conservative bloke who likes a quiet life. I don’t party, don’t even go on scary rides at the amusement park! And I don’t know the classics, so they generally run rings around me. Inadequate, perhaps, but that’s something I’ve had to accept. There is nuance to this topic, and I've tried to post some of what I think the nuance is. But what I think is interesting, is the women posting on this thread are looking at it from being on the receiving end and actually not discussing their expectations from the guys doing this, and you seem to be looking at it from the side of how am I being judged by the woman if I like her intelligence? How do I keep her interest as a result? The answer is, you shouldn't have to entertain her, just don't act like a jerk. If she likes you, she likes you, but she should also be complete enough to entertain herself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:41:28 GMT
alexandra I am saying that if a man likes the way I think, he's unavailable, because my unavailability shows. It's a specific thing, but others may want to consider it for themselves, to see if they are actually putting out unavailable vibes behind intellectually stimulating conversation. It can be a way to hide. What I'm doing in this thread is weighing in as a dismissive- saying I've seen this intellectual sparring too. This thread is about a chronically unavailable type called "softboi" and the intellectual interaction is part of his approach apparently. So, I'm commenting on the intellectual mind game thing as a pattern that I've seen as a very unavailable women. That attracted men who love the intellectual game. But I'm betting were very unavailable themselves (who else does a dismissive attract? We attract the emotionally unavailable because we Are Unavailable.)
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Dec 12, 2019 23:43:37 GMT
alexandra I am saying that if a man likes the way I think, he's unavailable, because my unavailability shows. It's a specific thing, but others may want to consider it for themselves, to see if they are actually putting out unavailable vibes behind intellectually stimulating conversation. It can be a way to hide. Ah, okay, that makes sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2019 23:47:20 GMT
alexandra I am saying that if a man likes the way I think, he's unavailable, because my unavailability shows. It's a specific thing, but others may want to consider it for themselves, to see if they are actually putting out unavailable vibes behind intellectually stimulating conversation. It can be a way to hide. Ah, okay, that makes sense. And, it may be that softbois are attracted to unavailable women who get caught in the trap, because they are lacking emotional availability themselves but are unaware of that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2019 0:06:03 GMT
alexandra I am saying that if a man likes the way I think, he's unavailable, because my unavailability shows. It's a specific thing, but others may want to consider it for themselves, to see if they are actually putting out unavailable vibes behind intellectually stimulating conversation. It can be a way to hide. What I'm doing in this thread is weighing in as a dismissive- saying I've seen this intellectual sparring too. This thread is about a chronically unavailable type called "softboi" and the intellectual interaction is part of his approach apparently. So, I'm commenting on the intellectual mind game thing as a pattern that I've seen as a very unavailable women. That attracted men who love the intellectual game. But I'm betting were very unavailable themselves (who else does a dismissive attract? We attract the emotionally unavailable because we Are Unavailable.) yes it definitely can be a way to hide. i'm definitely aware of that - i used to believe that my key (and only) value comes from being mentally agile/smart/whatever you want to call it, and so alot of my "entertainment" value comes from being good at mental sparring in conversations. that's what i've relied on to be attractive in dating. and because I'm now aware of this particular facet as a symptom of unavailability on both sides (me and date), it's become a red flag to me when someone is interested (mainly) in how I think rather than me more completely.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2019 0:10:02 GMT
@janedoe, Being a cerebral, it may be that you need to be "chaste" intellectually lol! But seriously- what i meant is perhaps de-emphasize intellectual conversations the way that someone too sex-driven would need to de-emphasize kissing and petting, if they want to get to know someone's other facets and not be blinded by sex.
maybe you could observe the intellect, appreciate it, but not engage it so heavily while getting to know. Just like I would need to appreciate the sexuality and alpha appeal of a man but not sit on his lap haha! Do you see what I mean though? Don't over engage what brings you to your knees and makes you want more. Let it be a pleasing observation and direct your attention to other values and qualities. Like abstaining from premature sex (never have ever done that once with someone who made it past my early exit. I'm not speaking from experience but from an Ideal that I would have in place if I had to do it again, now that I know myself better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2019 0:13:37 GMT
alexandra I am saying that if a man likes the way I think, he's unavailable, because my unavailability shows. It's a specific thing, but others may want to consider it for themselves, to see if they are actually putting out unavailable vibes behind intellectually stimulating conversation. It can be a way to hide. What I'm doing in this thread is weighing in as a dismissive- saying I've seen this intellectual sparring too. This thread is about a chronically unavailable type called "softboi" and the intellectual interaction is part of his approach apparently. So, I'm commenting on the intellectual mind game thing as a pattern that I've seen as a very unavailable women. That attracted men who love the intellectual game. But I'm betting were very unavailable themselves (who else does a dismissive attract? We attract the emotionally unavailable because we Are Unavailable.) yes it definitely can be a way to hide. i'm definitely aware of that - i used to believe that my key (and only) value comes from being mentally agile/smart/whatever you want to call it, and so alot of my "entertainment" value comes from being good at mental sparring in conversations. that's what i've relied on to be attractive in dating. and because I'm now aware of this particular facet as a symptom of unavailability on both sides (me and date), it's become a red flag to me when someone is interested (mainly) in how I think rather than me more completely. Precisely. I don't like intellectual conversation so if I'm engaging in it, it's a red flag and I know it. Haha! It's too intense for early days and getting to know me. I actually, these days, would just be able to say that to a date and suggest simple activities i think. To get a feeling in my body about them, and see if i am relaxed. If I am up in my head I am not in my body and it's not a good sign. Not when you're getting to know me. The closest friendships (relationships ) I have were developed without all that noise.
|
|