|
Post by seeking on Dec 12, 2023 21:26:27 GMT
I'm more of an AP-type, with some co-dependent traits mixed in there as is common for AP's, so I was identifying with the storyline of 'nobody's here for me, I'm too much'... Yes, that is part of the story line but what I'm realizing is that I don't make space for that with these other behaviors. That's more avoidance for me. And then complaining about how I don't have anyone but I'm avoiding the thing I say I want. The "too much" thing is questionable. It might be on average, but I think it's especially so for people who are more unavailable or not asking for what I give. So then it becomes "too much."
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 12, 2023 21:31:16 GMT
The avoidant info that you posted makes sense as well, but I will say that there seems to be a very common pattern of hyper-independence in single mothers who don't have much support around - some of that will be because of attachment/trauma/childhood wounding, but some of it is simply because we don't have much other choice and we develop strategies even as adults in order to cope. This is true. It's definitely a combo. I know I've refused a lot of potential support in favor of protecting my kid. I know single parents who have had "support" backfire - one of the worst being a woman whose daughter was molested by the person who was looking after her daughter so she could work. And then another one whose parent just kind of gave up keeping track of her so she could get anything done (the girl is older) but the girl has gotten a lot of attention in ways that aren't healthy. My daughter doesn't even sleep at her dad's - it's so stressful for her that while a night to myself is amazing, I always pay for it on the back-end with her stress and taking a week or more to recover. So it's like I pay for everything on the front-end.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 12, 2023 21:35:18 GMT
I'm just reflecting on the kinds of interactions you're posting here, and recognize that as an avoidant I tend(ed) to leave any situation with shocking ease when it encroaches, triggers, etc... I don't stick around for that trying to make it work. That's with the exception of a romantic attachment, those are very enduring for the anxious/avoidant dance no matter what side you're on. This is my third go around with the OCD friend. I've broken it off 2 other times previously. Shut down and blocked. Now I'm trying to stick with it? To what end, I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by seeking on Dec 12, 2023 21:40:09 GMT
But I can't see avoidance in clinging to the situations where you give and give, and are the one supporting the connection. Its like you're on the wrong side of the coin? I think it's a little convoluted or maybe looks different b/c it's non-romantic? But IDK, truly. Just thinking that the people in question aren't available for real connection so they're safer. I can easily be triggered Anxious. But I think as we all say here, at the root it's insecure. So is it anxious to chase unavailable people and then when they kind of act like you're too much or say something that may ever-so-slightly hint toward that, you get defensive? That's all that happened in my estimation. And then in looking more closely it's like hey wait - I'm the one GIVING to you (which I'm realizing is a lot of ... yes, supporting connection, but sometimes tripping over into a little rescuing). So it's a pretty mixed bag. I just figured it was avoidant since when I reflected on it lately, I realized if someone did show up giving me the kind of connection I say I want, and was available, I know I'd feel overwhelmed.
|
|
|
Post by sunrisequest on Dec 12, 2023 22:33:42 GMT
Oh duh. The minute I wrote that, I get it. I'm doing it to not be rejected. To feel valued so people won't want to ditch me and will need me. Lovely. Yep, this is it. It's setting relationships up so that giving and receiving are the main functions, rather than being, witnessing and sharing etc. It's like 'giving' is your currency of value, which is a co-dependent trait... But giving so heavily is often designed to control the relationship, so that you don't lose it, so that people need you, so they see value in you and don't leave you. I honestly don't have the right to say what is truly going on here, but I'm just suggesting that digging into the deeper dynamics of co-dependency might yield some results for you. It might actually be that your friends are available, but the relationships have been established in such a way that there is an imbalance in giving/support, and they are just playing their part in the roles that have potentially been playing out for some time. So it makes sense if they step back and don't fulfil their normal roles, it will create internal upset for you. I have a few friends who I see as co-dependent 'givers' and it can be very uncomfortable for me, because while I do need and want support from friends, if I sense I'm being 'fixed' or 'rescued', it feels very oppressive and disempowering and I feel like shutting down and becoming less available to those people - luckily I have the language to tell those people what I need instead of being 'fixed', and in fact had a conversation last night with one of my friends around that, and explained what it felt like to be told what I needed to do, when I more just need a witness while I go through my own process of healing. I hear you with the single mumming thing and the sheer level of things on your plate, and it being easier to do lots of things yourself. I have done this myself, and honestly, I am burned out and I cannot thrive from this zone. So coming to this realisation and accepting it fully has been my journey this year, and I'm now reaching out to every single avenue I can think of... schools, helplines, community organisations etc, because friends and partners are not able to carry my load for me, and I don't want to push them away and blame them because they can't. I am strong but I am not strong enough to do it on my own. So, yes, like you, I was also avoiding getting what I needed... but I do not have avoidant or fearful avoidant attachment, but I do have co-dependent traits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2023 0:23:14 GMT
I think its helpful to remember that both anxious and avoidant are unavailable for true intimacy. When actual connection not based on attachment stuff or codependency (and avoidants can be codependent with a different flavor), both avoidant and anxious shrink away, and anxious can actually leave the relationship of it gets too real.
The clue to the codependency is the big expenditures of time and energy on fixing someone they aren't responsible for... a friend or peer (although I think avoidants can be very involved in helping their kids). The avoidant approach that I recognize is more "you take care of yourself, I take care of myself." With some pretty stout boundaries around getting into another person's business, there is much more hesitancy and discomfort with doing so. Also the need to be needed as a motivation, that is a turn off for an avoidant. Acts of service are a big love language for me and many avoidants I know, but it's practical stuff, not that emotional caretaking.
A refusal to ask for help can be a lot of things. The refusal to ask for help for me has been largely unconscious as in, it doesn't occur to me, its not accompanied by an anxiety about being too much.
Not to say that my experience is the be all end all. And, we all have a mix of styles and strategies. But the glaring theme that I see here is the giving for security in the relationship, as a codependent trait. Avoidants tend to be sooo protective of their resources of time and energy, that it would seem impossible to have one high maintenance fixer relationship, let alone several. I'd feel as if I were drowning to give that much to other adults. Really, I need people around me to pull their own weight, and I think generally thats how avoidants view relationahips. That's the big thing that stands out to me.
|
|
|
Post by sunrisequest on Dec 13, 2023 0:27:19 GMT
I was more referring to the codependent dynamic potentially being created when there's an imbalance of giving and support, which you're suggesting is you being the giver, and some of your friends being the receivers. If you're giving free therapy and spending countless hours advising them, but not really getting the type of connection you want back - is it potentially the case that you're giving them a level of support and connection you would actually like to have for yourself (but don't feel comfortable receiving and therefore don't ask), hence the feeling of resentment you have when they back off and you end up feeling like the small things you ask for are too much? I was thinking about just this thing yesterday; however, I don't know if it's support if I'm trying to fix them on some level. Actually, it's more like I want to offer them something of value/feel valuable. And my focus on them is focus off of me. it's a weird form of regulation. So I don't know that I would want that back. I had a friend like that once and it was annoying. She was trying to get me to go to therapy, trying to get me to go to church. I backed way off. I'm more aware of when I'm doing it now. But I don't fully know the motivation other than self-avoidance/disconnection to some extent. And of course it does nothing toward my goal of feeling more nourished, connected, supported - esp in relationship to others. I feel like you've pretty much described what co-dependency is in a nutshell here... it IS a weird form of regulation. Takes the focus off you and puts it on them. Trying to fix them so you can be valuable and keep hold of them. It's also what was happening with your sister, because you perceive that you're giving a lot more to her, and her life isn't as hard as yours, and she's more messed up than you... it takes the focus off the fact that you are lonely, struggling, and potentially just deeply crave that connection to be a functional one where you get what you need from it. In terms of where it's coming from, I don't think it's an avoidant attachment style... it's more likely a type of enmeshment, or soft internal boundaries that separate you from you and other people. Not being able to feel into the fact that someone else's pain is not your pain, or being anxious that someone else's pain will eventually mean you'll end up being abandoned... and doing what you can to avoid that.
|
|
|
Post by cherrycola on Dec 13, 2023 4:07:56 GMT
This has turned into such a great discussion on co-dependency. I am going to recommend a great book with a silly title. How to be an adult by David Richo. One of the most impactful parts of it was about how he stopped telling others what to do/how to do it, and how much of a challenge he found that. It really changed the way I view relating.
I've also though a lot more about why making myself a safe place for others worked for me. I think it's because I can't do things for myself. Self care/Self love, BLEH. But jumping to help someone else, sure. 100%. So I hijacked my co-dependency for the good?. Because being an emotionally safe place for others is not about fixing them or tolerating their dysfunction. And it is definitely not about over giving and being resentful. It is about showing up in an emotionally grounded and adult space when relating to them. It requires me to slow down and figure out my feelings. It requires me to communicate non-violently and clearly. And to protect my time and energy so that I am able to show up more consistently. It also means NO FIXING. Because fixing is not being a safe place. It is not loving, and our friends are adults who can figure out their own life. It feels VERY uncomfortable to try to change your patterns like this, and I often still get it wrong, but it is worth it. For me this meant a lot of biting my tongue at first. Because it felt like well I know the answer and if they don't do X, Y, Z in that order, they'll never get better, they are going to stay stuck and that'll suck. But you know what, that is their path. I have no control over others, nor do I want it. It is exhausting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2023 15:48:30 GMT
When you guys talk about "fixing", I'm not sure exactly what that looks like vs. just talking with someone about their lives. Do you feel a need to accomplish some kind of outcome, give directives, etc? Manipulate? Curious what it looks like when you catch yourself in fixing mode, and how that differs from support and concern.
So if someone mentions they are having some kind of struggle, what are your healthy lines and where do you get into trouble?
What are the distinguishing characteristics for you between support and fixing, encouragement and control, helpful suggestions vs unsolicited advice? My girlfriend and I offer suggestions to each other when in some kind of pickle, and we've discussed it, it's welcome on both ends.
I guess it has not only to do with certain ways of aproaching the conversation, but also with the temperaments of the individuals and their dynamic? Lots of people will accept a suggestion or advice without feeling put off, understanding there is no agenda or control,and even appreciate it (me included). But I've seen some things on the net that seem to pretty much equate suggestions or advice as control and some kind of offense.
Of course a good approach is to ask the speaker what kind of support they need. Just curious about what you all think about these things.
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Dec 13, 2023 16:45:16 GMT
When you guys talk about "fixing", I'm not sure exactly what that looks like vs. just talking with someone about their lives. Do you feel a need to accomplish some kind of outcome, give directives, etc? Manipulate? Curious what it looks like when you catch yourself in fixing mode, and how that differs from support and concern. So if someone mentions they are having some kind of struggle, what are your healthy lines and where do you get into trouble? What are the distinguishing characteristics for you between support and fixing, encouragement and control, helpful suggestions vs unsolicited advice? My girlfriend and I offer suggestions to each other when in some kind of pickle, and we've discussed it, it's welcome on both ends. I guess it has not only to do with certain ways of aproaching the conversation, but also with the temperaments of the individuals and their dynamic? Lots of people will accept a suggestion or advice without feeling put off, understanding there is no agenda or control,and even appreciate it (me included). But I've seen some things on the net that seem to pretty much equate suggestions or advice as control and some kind of offense. Of course a good approach is to ask the speaker what kind of support they need. Just curious about what you all think about these things. I think it is the degree of attention towards the other person. Supporting someone does not take your eye off of your own balls….trying to fix issues for other people is when you go deep into the other person’s problems that you lose sight of your own. And as has been stated above, there can be a reward…a feeling of being needed, a feeling of helping, a feeling of accomplishment that perhaps is missing when looking at your own issues. It can become very enmeshing, it can also become tit for tat….”i am very much in tuned to your needs…why are you not in tune to mine”. It can be a coping mechinism…”at least this small area of my life I have control over.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2023 19:27:01 GMT
When you guys talk about "fixing", I'm not sure exactly what that looks like vs. just talking with someone about their lives. Do you feel a need to accomplish some kind of outcome, give directives, etc? Manipulate? Curious what it looks like when you catch yourself in fixing mode, and how that differs from support and concern. So if someone mentions they are having some kind of struggle, what are your healthy lines and where do you get into trouble? What are the distinguishing characteristics for you between support and fixing, encouragement and control, helpful suggestions vs unsolicited advice? My girlfriend and I offer suggestions to each other when in some kind of pickle, and we've discussed it, it's welcome on both ends. I guess it has not only to do with certain ways of aproaching the conversation, but also with the temperaments of the individuals and their dynamic? Lots of people will accept a suggestion or advice without feeling put off, understanding there is no agenda or control,and even appreciate it (me included). But I've seen some things on the net that seem to pretty much equate suggestions or advice as control and some kind of offense. Of course a good approach is to ask the speaker what kind of support they need. Just curious about what you all think about these things. I think it is the degree of attention towards the other person. Supporting someone does not take your eye off of your own balls….trying to fix issues for other people is when you go deep into the other person’s problems that you lose sight of your own. And as has been stated above, there can be a reward…a feeling of being needed, a feeling of helping, a feeling of accomplishment that perhaps is missing when looking at your own issues. It can become very enmeshing, it can also become tit for tat….”i am very much in tuned to your needs…why are you not in tune to mine”. It can be a coping mechinism…”at least this small area of my life I have control over.” Oh, I see... its much larger than the conversation itself then? Like taking on a project? As opposed to an exchange where you mention your stuff, get feedback, then I mention mine or relate and share , etc, both people give and take?
|
|
|
Post by cherrycola on Dec 13, 2023 22:30:13 GMT
Fixing for me is anything that crosses into someone's agency as an adult. Or acting like they can't solve problems on their own. While you are right that there is a healthy level of advice / back and forth in adult relating it can easily cross a line. For example, my best friend when I have a problem will often excessively offer me solutions, like 3-4 of them, and often really simple things I have already done. We have really improved our efforts on both sides of this, me to tell her I just want validation and her to first validate and then ask if I want solutions. My sister believes that everyone needs counselling and excessively goes on and on about this every opportunity she gets. She routinely acts like if they don't get counselling their lives with continue to be shitty and if they just listened to her, they would be better off. I've been on the giving end of this, if I feel someone NEEDS to do my suggestion and I feel an anxiety when they don't do it. Then that is more of a fixing mentality then a here is something I found helpful mentality.
I try to not defaulting to solutions anymore. If my sentence starts with "you should" then for me, it's not coming from the right place. Reflecting on this, is the anxious belief that if YOU fix yourself, then we can be happy. IF you just did X then you would be better and we could have a relationship. So it is a maladapted work around to being an adult and doing the uncomfortable work of setting boundaries with someone who is showing up in a way that hurts me.
It's also spending far more of my time / energy on someone else than for myself. Some people are very rooted in their victim mentality and I found them wanting a mother more than a partner. They would word things in a way that next thing I knew I was spending hours doing a task for them that they should be doing on their own. Not because I wanted to, but because I felt like I had to because look at me being the happy healthy adult in the relationship. It's also routinely bailing someone out because they fail to plan and just expect everyone around them to pick up the pieces.
I often check in with myself now and ask "If I get nothing back at all from doing this thing, how am I going to feel?" and let that guide me. If I drive you to the airport because you failed to leave enough time to get there on your own, am I going to resent you because I really don't have the time to do this? (actual example)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2023 1:45:36 GMT
Fixing for me is anything that crosses into someone's agency as an adult. Or acting like they can't solve problems on their own. While you are right that there is a healthy level of advice / back and forth in adult relating it can easily cross a line. For example, my best friend when I have a problem will often excessively offer me solutions, like 3-4 of them, and often really simple things I have already done. We have really improved our efforts on both sides of this, me to tell her I just want validation and her to first validate and then ask if I want solutions. My sister believes that everyone needs counselling and excessively goes on and on about this every opportunity she gets. She routinely acts like if they don't get counselling their lives with continue to be shitty and if they just listened to her, they would be better off. I've been on the giving end of this, if I feel someone NEEDS to do my suggestion and I feel an anxiety when they don't do it. Then that is more of a fixing mentality then a here is something I found helpful mentality. I try to not defaulting to solutions anymore. If my sentence starts with "you should" then for me, it's not coming from the right place. Reflecting on this, is the anxious belief that if YOU fix yourself, then we can be happy. IF you just did X then you would be better and we could have a relationship. So it is a maladapted work around to being an adult and doing the uncomfortable work of setting boundaries with someone who is showing up in a way that hurts me. It's also spending far more of my time / energy on someone else than for myself. Some people are very rooted in their victim mentality and I found them wanting a mother more than a partner. They would word things in a way that next thing I knew I was spending hours doing a task for them that they should be doing on their own. Not because I wanted to, but because I felt like I had to because look at me being the happy healthy adult in the relationship. It's also routinely bailing someone out because they fail to plan and just expect everyone around them to pick up the pieces. I often check in with myself now and ask "If I get nothing back at all from doing this thing, how am I going to feel?" and let that guide me. If I drive you to the airport because you failed to leave enough time to get there on your own, am I going to resent you because I really don't have the time to do this? (actual example) This is so helpful. So there's more to it than I realized, it seems to go deep for the person doing the fixing, with an urgency behind it. Also, it seems like it's often from a dynamic... one person doesn't take responsibility for themselves and the other steps in to take on the fixer role, and off to the races? I'm sure that's not always the case, someone may be a fixer and go over the line with anyone whether they are "attracting" that or not. There seems to be an active energy to it, a drive to focus on the fixer-upper, as a way to turn away from oneself? So it would make sense that anxious is more prone to this behavior than avoidant, we with the dependent vs. Self sufficient approaches to relationship. But not just that, the self-focus of the avoidant would deter this kind of deep involvement in someone else's affairs, because of natural tendency to self-absorption, not a pretty trait but also not prone to taking on other people's problems . It seems like there is a real permeability in the boundaries in that dynamic, I imagine a mesh screen and the fixer smooshes through it like a play dough extruder. Do some people welcome this kind of caretaking? Am I reading that right, some people look for someone to kind of mother them? Do you find that jn friendships, where one person willingly becomes the child to the other's parental type energy?
|
|
|
Post by cherrycola on Dec 14, 2023 2:07:14 GMT
This is so helpful. So there's more to it than I realized, it seems to go deep for the person doing the fixing, with an urgency behind it. Also, it seems like it's often from a dynamic... one person doesn't take responsibility for themselves and the other steps in to take on the fixer role, and off to the races? I'm sure that's not always the case, someone may be a fixer and go over the line with anyone whether they are "attracting" that or not. There seems to be an active energy to it, a drive to focus on the fixer-upper, as a way to turn away from oneself? So it would make sense that anxious is more prone to this behavior than avoidant, we with the dependent vs. Self sufficient approaches to relationship. But not just that, the self-focus of the avoidant would deter this kind of deep involvement in someone else's affairs, because of natural tendency to self-absorption, not a pretty trait but also not prone to taking on other people's problems . It seems like there is a real permeability in the boundaries in that dynamic, I imagine a mesh screen and the fixer smooshes through it like a play dough extruder. Do some people welcome this kind of caretaking? Am I reading that right, some people look for someone to kind of mother them? Do you find that jn friendships, where one person willingly becomes the child to the other's parental type energy? Great summary. Yes, it is very much a turning away from oneself. Roles can be, but are not always stable. I usually think of it in terms of the drama triangle. We all have our preferred roles but we can switch between them. It also can come from a place of "I can only be okay, if you are okay" which is typically a fear left over from childhood. I have a friend where he and his wife can only have one person "okay" at a time and at any given time the other is in crisis. If that spouse starts to stabilize, it swaps and suddenly they are now the care giver. I have had friends that are situationally fixers, like my best friend, she tends to have bad boundaries and attract needier people who suck and suck but when I put up boundaries for the both of us she was relieved. She knows I am a fully formed adult who can handle my own things. Then I've met people who can't help it no matter what you do, or how much you insist you are fine, they need to be overly enmeshed. and yes I have also had people who try to drag me into a caretaking role against my wishes. That was the only place they can operate from and feel love from. Even if you say "you've got this" they just insist they do not and they need you to do the thing for them. Or they have been bailed out so often through out their life they have learned that someone else will always come along to pickup the pieces so why would they do the work? I think the avoidant is usually the one in the "fixee" role. But as you know they resist enmeshment so then you have the AP chasing and trying to fix them and the avoidant running away and resisting. The more traditional role would be the alcoholic/addict and the enabling spouse. We subconsciously will attract/be attracted to, the people who are going to fulfill the flip side of the dynamic for us.
|
|
|
Post by sunrisequest on Dec 14, 2023 2:56:31 GMT
Fixing for me is anything that crosses into someone's agency as an adult. Or acting like they can't solve problems on their own. While you are right that there is a healthy level of advice / back and forth in adult relating it can easily cross a line. For example, my best friend when I have a problem will often excessively offer me solutions, like 3-4 of them, and often really simple things I have already done. We have really improved our efforts on both sides of this, me to tell her I just want validation and her to first validate and then ask if I want solutions. My sister believes that everyone needs counselling and excessively goes on and on about this every opportunity she gets. She routinely acts like if they don't get counselling their lives with continue to be shitty and if they just listened to her, they would be better off. I've been on the giving end of this, if I feel someone NEEDS to do my suggestion and I feel an anxiety when they don't do it. Then that is more of a fixing mentality then a here is something I found helpful mentality. I try to not defaulting to solutions anymore. If my sentence starts with "you should" then for me, it's not coming from the right place. Reflecting on this, is the anxious belief that if YOU fix yourself, then we can be happy. IF you just did X then you would be better and we could have a relationship. So it is a maladapted work around to being an adult and doing the uncomfortable work of setting boundaries with someone who is showing up in a way that hurts me. It's also spending far more of my time / energy on someone else than for myself. Some people are very rooted in their victim mentality and I found them wanting a mother more than a partner. They would word things in a way that next thing I knew I was spending hours doing a task for them that they should be doing on their own. Not because I wanted to, but because I felt like I had to because look at me being the happy healthy adult in the relationship. It's also routinely bailing someone out because they fail to plan and just expect everyone around them to pick up the pieces. I often check in with myself now and ask "If I get nothing back at all from doing this thing, how am I going to feel?" and let that guide me. If I drive you to the airport because you failed to leave enough time to get there on your own, am I going to resent you because I really don't have the time to do this? (actual example) This is how I see things in terms of the definition of fixing as well. I think that phrase 'You should' is so key... even if you're thinking that in your head when someone is talking (they just need to do X,Y,Z, they clearly should be doing this or that...) then you're coming from a place of trying to tell someone what they should do, thinking that you know better than them, which just immediately disempowers the other person and creates almost a hierarchy of power and control within the relationship. Almost like a mother/child dynamic rather than peer to peer. I think most people are looking to be seen and validated when they share a problem - literally just someone to say, that sounds tough, I can imagine you must be feeling such and such, is there anything I can do to support... that kind of thing. It's so hard to not give someone the solutions, especially when you're looking from the outside and you think they're missing something. Sometimes your perspective can be very valuable to someone... but even if your thoughts are valid and bang on the money, it can create an imbalance or resentment in the relationship. I've realised it's more important to be a safe and secure space for friends than it is to give them the right answers to things. Ultimately, it's their journey and protecting the relationship is more important than trying to take away all their problems. Introvert, I think that sounds healthy that you have a reciprocal arrangement with a friend, where you're both happy with that exchange of ideas and advice. The key there is it's reciprocal. And also you've both discussed it and know where you stand. And there will be times where people do want to hear your advice and ideas, I know I do - but I like to ask for it myself, or have them ask me if it's okay before they charge ahead. That feels respectful and like we're on the same level. But I get very overwhelmed and resentful when people try and fix me, and I think it's because I do feel the energy behind it. The anxiety and their need for me to do what they're saying in order for them to be comfortable. I've noticed that it makes some people very uncomfortable when I'm not in a good space, and it adds pressure, because it's hard enough being in a bad spot, without having to deal with people who are triggered or frustrated by me being in a bad spot!
|
|